Literature DB >> 21881087

The breast screening programme and misinforming the public.

Peter C Gøtzsche1, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen.   

Abstract

The information provided to the public by the NHS Breast Screening Programme has been criticized for lack of balance, omission of information on harms and substantially exaggerated estimates of benefit. These shortcomings have been particularly evident in the various invitation leaflets for breast screening and in the Programme's own 2008 Annual Review, which celebrated 20 years of screening. The debate on screening has been heated after new data published in the last two years questioned the benefit and documented substantial harm. We therefore analysed whether the recent debate and new pivotal data about breast screening has had any impact on the contents of the new 2010 leaflet and on the 2010 Annual Review. We conclude that spokespeople for the Programme have stuck to the beliefs about benefit that prevailed 25 years ago. Concerns about over-diagnosis have not been addressed either and official documents still downplay this most important harm of breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21881087      PMCID: PMC3164247          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

Review 1.  Women need better information about routine mammography.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards; Michael Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

2.  Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

3.  Breast screening: the facts--or maybe not.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Ole J Hartling; Margrethe Nielsen; John Brodersen; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-27

4.  Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John D Keen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  L Nyström; L E Rutqvist; S Wall; A Lindgren; M Lindqvist; S Rydén; I Andersson; N Bjurstam; G Fagerberg; J Frisell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effect of NHS breast screening programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality.

Authors:  R G Blanks; S M Moss; C E McGahan; M J Quinn; P J Babb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

7.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Zahl; Jan Maehlen; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24

Review 10.  Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Misplaced criticism of breast screening research.

Authors:  Stephen Duffy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Breast screening review--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  M J Michell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  'Overdiagnosis' and mortality in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann Johnson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

6.  Online information about mammography screening in Italy from 2014 to 2021.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Lucia Abagnale; Angela Avitabile
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maren Reder; Petra Kolip
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Scarce information about breast cancer screening: An Italian websites analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Concetta Paola Pelullo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  A Review and Comparative Analysis of Information Targeted to the General Public on the Websites of Breast Screening Programs in Canada.

Authors:  Anne J Kearney; Julie Polisena; Andra Morrison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-11

10.  A survey study of women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening in Britain.

Authors:  J Waller; K L Whitaker; K Winstanley; E Power; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.