Literature DB >> 22745202

Breast screening review--a radiologist's perspective.

M J Michell1.   

Abstract

Recently published articles in the lay press and scientific journals have questioned the value of breast screening, and have raised concerns about both possible harmful effects and the information provided for females when they receive their screening invitation. A review of data from screening trials and the process for providing information for the public on screening has been announced by Professor Sir Mike Richards, National Clinical Director for Cancer. What are the major issues involved and what expectations should radiologists and other members of the screening team have of the review?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745202      PMCID: PMC3474085          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21332901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

1.  Breast cancer awareness month. Still awaiting screening facts.

Authors:  Michael Baum; Hazel Thornton; Peter C Gøtzsche; Susan Bewley; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Alexandra Barratt; Nick Ross; Steven Woloshin; Lisa Schwartz; Toni Musiello; Mitzi Blennerhassett; Maryann Napoli; Cornelia J Baines; Jayant S Vaidya; Norman Williams; Daphne Havercroft; Per-Henrik Zahl; Michael Retsky; Robert M Kaplan; Mary Dixon-Woods; Donald A Berry; Keith Isaacson; Diana Brahams; Miriam Pryke; Gillian Tindall; David A Bender; Tom Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-02

2.  Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  EUROCARE-4 studies bring new data on cancer survival.

Authors:  Mike Richards
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guideline 2009.

Authors:  J Yarnold
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Mammographic screening and "overdiagnosis".

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality?

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John D Keen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.

Authors:  László Tabár; Bedrich Vitak; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Anders Cohen; Tibor Tot; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Johan Rosell; Helena Fohlin; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Carlo La Vecchia; Carlo LaVecchia; Lars Vatten; Anna Gavin; Clarisse Héry; Mary Heanue
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-11

9.  Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Anna Gavin; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-28

10.  Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Laszlo Tabar; Anne Helene Olsen; Bedrich Vitak; Prue C Allgood; Tony H H Chen; Amy M F Yen; Robert A Smith
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?

Authors:  Mark C Murphy; Louise Coffey; Ailbhe C O'Neill; Cecily Quinn; Ruth Prichard; Sorcha McNally
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiomic Evaluations of the Diagnostic Performance of DM, DBT, DCE MRI, DWI, and Their Combination for the Diagnosisof Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shuxian Niu; Xiaoyu Wang; Nannan Zhao; Guanyu Liu; Yangyang Kan; Yue Dong; E-Nuo Cui; Yahong Luo; Tao Yu; Xiran Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.