INTRODUCTION: The differences in sagittal spino-pelvic alignment between adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) and the normal population are still poorly understood. In particular, it is still unknown if particular patterns of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment are more prevalent in chronic LBP. The current study helps to better understand the relationship between sagittal alignment and low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of patients with chronic LBP with a cohort of asymptomatic adults. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was evaluated in prospective cohorts of 198 patients with chronic LBP and 709 normal subjects. The two cohorts were compared with respect to the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar tilt (LT), lordotic levels, thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracic tilt (TT), kyphotic levels, and lumbosacral joint angle (LSA). Correlations between parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment is significantly different in chronic LBP with respect to SS, PI, LT, lordotic levels, TK, TT and LSA, but not PT, LL, and kyphotic levels. Correlations between parameters were similar for the two cohorts. As compared to normal adults, a greater proportion of patients with LBP presented low SS and LL associated with a small PI, while a greater proportion of normal subjects presented normal or high SS associated with normal or high PI. CONCLUSION: Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was different between patients with chronic LBP and controls. In particular, there was a greater proportion of chronic LBP patients with low SS, low LL and small PI, suggesting the relationship between this specific pattern and the presence of chronic LBP.
INTRODUCTION: The differences in sagittal spino-pelvic alignment between adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) and the normal population are still poorly understood. In particular, it is still unknown if particular patterns of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment are more prevalent in chronic LBP. The current study helps to better understand the relationship between sagittal alignment and low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of patients with chronic LBP with a cohort of asymptomatic adults. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was evaluated in prospective cohorts of 198 patients with chronic LBP and 709 normal subjects. The two cohorts were compared with respect to the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar tilt (LT), lordotic levels, thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracic tilt (TT), kyphotic levels, and lumbosacral joint angle (LSA). Correlations between parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment is significantly different in chronic LBP with respect to SS, PI, LT, lordotic levels, TK, TT and LSA, but not PT, LL, and kyphotic levels. Correlations between parameters were similar for the two cohorts. As compared to normal adults, a greater proportion of patients with LBP presented low SS and LL associated with a small PI, while a greater proportion of normal subjects presented normal or high SS associated with normal or high PI. CONCLUSION: Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was different between patients with chronic LBP and controls. In particular, there was a greater proportion of chronic LBP patients with low SS, low LL and small PI, suggesting the relationship between this specific pattern and the presence of chronic LBP.
Authors: Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Seungchul Rhim; Gene Cheh Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Vidyadhar V Upasani; John Tis; Tracey Bastrom; Jeff Pawelek; Michelle Marks; Baron Lonner; Alvin Crawford; Peter O Newton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Kristen E Radcliff; Fabio Orozco; Nicholas Molby; Lawrence Delasotta; Eric Chen; Zachary Post; Alvin Ong Journal: Orthop Surg Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.071
Authors: Jean-Charles Le Huec; Antonio Faundez; Dennis Dominguez; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Stéphane Aunoble Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Mihai Mardare; Manuel Oprea; Iulian Popa; Ancuța Zazgyva; Marius Niculescu; Dan V Poenaru Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2016-08-25