Literature DB >> 24026168

Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in adolescent thoracic scoliosis secondary to Chiari I malformation: a comparison between the left and the right curves.

Zezhang Zhu1, Shifu Sha, Zhen Liu, Xu Sun, Long Jiang, Huang Yan, Bangping Qian, Yong Qiu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the sagittal morphology differs between the left and right thoracic curves in patients with Chiari malformation-associated scoliosis (CMS).
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a left thoracic curve constituted the CM-L group, whereas 44 patients with a right thoracic curve were assigned into the CM-R group. Another cohort of 90 age- and gender-matched asymptomatic adolescents was enrolled to serve as the control group. Seven sagittal parameters were evaluated on standing lateral radiographs, including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis (TJK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS).
RESULTS: Compared to the normal controls, the TK, LL and SS were significantly greater in the CM-L group, along with a significantly decreased PT. Similar changes in SS and PT were also demonstrated in the CM-R group, while the TK and LL were found to be relatively normal compared with the control group. Concerning CMS patients with different curve directions, significantly increased TK and LL were observed in the CM-L group, whereas all three pelvic parameters were similar for the two groups. In addition, no significant differences were noted between the three groups in PI, TJK or SVA. Moreover, the LL was strongly related to the TK and SS in all three groups, but to the PI only in the control and CM-R groups. A significant correlation was also noted between TK and SS in the CM-L group.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in sagittal profiles indeed exist between CMS patients and healthy adolescents, as well as between CMS patients with different curve directions. In CMI patients with a left thoracic curve, compensatory alterations appear to occur in LL in response to the increased TK to maintain a balanced posture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026168      PMCID: PMC3897820          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2980-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Determination of "normal" thoracic kyphosis: a roentgenographic study of 121 "normal" children.

Authors:  E H Boseker; J H Moe; R B Winter; S E Koop
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves.

Authors:  J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Hecquet; C Marty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A study of vertebral rotation.

Authors:  C L Nash; J H Moe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults.

Authors:  R Vedantam; L G Lenke; J A Keeney; K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Radiographic determination of lordosis and kyphosis in normal and scoliotic children.

Authors:  S L Propst-Proctor; E E Bleck
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Sagittal plane deformity in the thoracic spine: a clue to the presence of syringomyelia as a cause of scoliosis.

Authors:  Jean A Ouellet; Javier LaPlaza; Mark A Erickson; John G Birch; Stephen Burke; Richard Browne
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Scoliotic curve patterns in patients with Chiari I malformation and/or syringomyelia.

Authors:  David A Spiegel; John M Flynn; Peter J Stasikelis; John P Dormans; Denis S Drummond; Keith R Gabriel; Randall T Loder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Sagittal profiles of the spine in scoliosis associated with an Arnold-Chiari malformation with or without syringomyelia.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Peter Stasikelis; Frances A Farley
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  M Bernhardt; K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Sagittal profiles of the spine.

Authors:  S A Voutsinas; G D MacEwen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Overcorrection of lumbar lordosis for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: comparison of radiographic outcomes between overcorrection and undercorrection.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Chung Kang; Hyun-Seok Oh; Young-Jun Kim; Hyuk Jung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Risks and outcomes of spinal deformity surgery in Chiari malformation, Type 1, with syringomyelia versus adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jakub Godzik; Terrence F Holekamp; David D Limbrick; Lawrence G Lenke; T S Park; Wilson Z Ray; Keith H Bridwell; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent thoracic scoliosis secondary to Chiari I malformation: a comparison between the left and the right curves.

Authors:  Long Jiang; Yong Qiu; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Benlong Shi; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of spinal deformity in children with Chiari I malformation with and without syringomyelia: matched cohort study.

Authors:  J Godzik; A Dardas; M P Kelly; T F Holekamp; L G Lenke; M D Smyth; T S Park; J R Leonard; D D Limbrick
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Assessment of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in asymptomatic Chinese juveniles and adolescents: a large cohort study and comparative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Canglong Hou; Kai Chen; Yu Chen; Tianjunke Zhou; Mingyuan Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.