Literature DB >> 16985463

An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?

Yongjung J Kim1, Keith H Bridwell, Lawrence G Lenke, Seungchul Rhim, Gene Cheh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors controlling sagittal spinal balance after long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to L5 or S1. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To our knowledge, no study on postoperative sagittal balance following long adult spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1 has been published.
METHODS: A clinical and radiographic assessment of 80 patients with adult lumbar deformity (average age 53.4 years) who underwent long (average 7.6 vertebrae, 5-11 vertebrae) segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to the L5-S1 (average 4.5 years, 2-15.8-year follow-up) was performed. We defined the optimal sagittal balance (n = 42) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 < or = 3.0 cm, and the suboptimal sagittal balance (n = 38) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 > 3.0 cm at ultimate follow-up.
RESULTS: The optimal sagittal balance group (C7 plumb, average -0.6 +/- 2.5 cm) had the larger average angle differences between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis (P < 0.0001), preoperative smaller pelvic incidence (P = 0.007), smaller average thoracolumbar junctional angle (T10-L2) increase (P < 0.0001), and bigger lumbar lordosis angle increase (P = 0.014) at ultimate follow-up. Patients with optimal sagittal balance at ultimate follow-up had significantly higher total Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcome scores than those with suboptimal sagittal balance (P = 0.015). Risk factors that were statistically significant for the suboptimal sagittal balance group included pelvic incidence compared with lumbar lordosis (> or = 45 degrees) before surgery (vs. < 45 degrees, P = 0.009), smaller lumbar lordosis compared with thoracic kyphosis (< 20 degrees) at 8 weeks postoperatively (vs. > or = 20 degrees, P = 0.013), and older than 55 years of age at surgery (vs. 55 years or younger, P = 0.024).
CONCLUSION: A sagittal Cobb angle difference between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis of > 20 degrees (higher lumbar lordosis) is advisable in most circumstances to achieve optimal sagittal balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985463     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238970.67552.f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; P Roussouly; E Berthonnaud; P Guigui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Overcorrection of lumbar lordosis for adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance: comparison of radiographic outcomes between overcorrection and undercorrection.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Tack Kim; Sang-Hun Lee; Kyung-Chung Kang; Hyun-Seok Oh; Young-Jun Kim; Hyuk Jung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Chaléat-Valayer; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Jérôme Paquet; Eric Berthonnaud; Fabienne Siani; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Correlation between the apex of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in asymptomatic adult.

Authors:  Changyu Pan; Guodong Wang; Jianmin Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Jean Charles Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity.

Authors:  Jung-Hee Lee; Ki-Ho Na; Jin-Hyok Kim; Ho-Yeon Jeong; Dong-Gune Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.