Literature DB >> 21869856

Bi-Linear Regression for O Quantification: Modeling across the Elution Profile.

Jeanette E Eckel-Passow1, Douglas W Mahoney, Ann L Oberg, Roman M Zenka, Kenneth L Johnson, K Sreekumaran Nair, Yogish C Kudva, H Robert Bergen, Terry M Therneau.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Interpreting and quantifying labeled mass-spectrometry data is complex and requires automated algorithms, particularly for large scale proteomic profiling. Here, we propose the use of bi-linear regression to quantify relative abundance across the elution profile in a unified model. The bi-linear regression model takes advantage of the fact that while peptides differ in overall abundance across the elution profile multiplicatively, the relative abundance between the mixed samples remains constant across the elution profile. We describe how to apply bi-linear regression models to (18)O stable-isotope labeled data, which allows for the direct comparison of two samples simultaneously. Interpretation of model parameters is also discussed. The incorporation rate of the labeling isotope is estimated as part of the modeling process and can be used as a measure of data quality. Application is demonstrated in a controlled experiment as well as in a complex mixture.
RESULTS: Bi-linear regression models allow for more precise and accurate estimates of abundance, in comparison to methods that treat each spectrum independently, by taking into account the abundance of the molecule throughout the entire elution profile, with precision increased by one-to-two orders of magnitude.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21869856      PMCID: PMC3159958          DOI: 10.4172/jpb.1000158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform        ISSN: 0974-276X


  17 in total

1.  Simultaneous quantification and identification using 18O labeling with an ion trap mass spectrometer and the analysis software application "ZoomQuant".

Authors:  Wayne A Hicks; Brian D Halligan; Ronit Y Slyper; Simon N Twigger; Andrew S Greene; Michael Olivier
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Regression analysis for comparing protein samples with 16O/18O stable-isotope labeled mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; C J Mason; D W Mahoney; K L Johnson; J E Olson; H R Bergen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Improved method for differential expression proteomics using trypsin-catalyzed 18O labeling with a correction for labeling efficiency.

Authors:  Antonio Ramos-Fernández; Daniel López-Ferrer; Jesús Vázquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Global quantitative proteomic profiling through 18O-labeling in combination with MS/MS spectra analysis.

Authors:  Carl A White; Nicodemus Oey; Andrew Emili
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Markov-chain-based heteroscedastic regression model for the analysis of high-resolution enzymatically 18O-labeled mass spectra.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Dirk Valkenborg; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions.

Authors:  M W Senko; S C Beu; F W McLaffertycor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Methods for combining peptide intensities to estimate relative protein abundance.

Authors:  Brian Carrillo; Corey Yanofsky; Sylvie Laboissiere; Robert Nadon; Robert E Kearney
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  A method for automatically interpreting mass spectra of 18O-labeled isotopic clusters.

Authors:  Christopher J Mason; Terry M Therneau; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Kenneth L Johnson; Ann L Oberg; Janet E Olson; K Sreekumaran Nair; David C Muddiman; H Robert Bergen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus.

Authors:  X Yao; A Freas; J Ramirez; P A Demirev; C Fenselau
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  A method for calculating 16O/18O peptide ion ratios for the relative quantification of proteomes.

Authors:  Kenneth L Johnson; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accurate LC peak boundary detection for ¹⁶O/¹⁸O labeled LC-MS data.

Authors:  Jian Cui; Konstantinos Petritis; Tony Tegeler; Brianne Petritis; Xuepo Ma; Yufang Jin; Shou-Jiang S J Gao; Jianqiu Michelle Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Statistical methods for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomic experiments with labeling.

Authors:  Ann L Oberg; Douglas W Mahoney
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.