Literature DB >> 15047049

A method for calculating 16O/18O peptide ion ratios for the relative quantification of proteomes.

Kenneth L Johnson1, David C Muddiman.   

Abstract

A method is described for the identification and relative quantification of proteomes using accurate mass tags (AMT) generated by nLC-dual ESI-FT-ICR-MS on a 7T instrument in conjunction with stable isotope labeling using 16O/18O ratios. AMTs were used for putative peptide identification, followed by confirmation of peptide identity by tandem mass spectrometry. For a combined set of 58 tryptic peptides from bovine serum albumin (BSA) and human transferrin, a mean mass measurement accuracy of 1.9 ppm +/-0.94 ppm (CIM99%) was obtained. This subset of tryptic peptides was used to measure 16O/18O ratios of 0.36 +/- 0.09 (CIM99%) for BSA (micro = 0.33) and 1.48 +/- 0.47 (CIM99%) for transferrin (micro = 1.0) using a method for calculating 16O/18O ratios from overlapping isotopic multiplets arising from mixtures of 16O, 18O1, and 18O2 labeled C-termini. The model amino acid averagine was used to calculate a representative molecular formula for estimating and subtracting the contributions of naturally occurring isotopes solely as a function of peptide molecular weight. The method was tested against simulated composite 16O/18O spectra where peptide molecular weight, 16O/18O ratio, 18O1/18O2 ratios, and number of sulfur atoms were varied. Relative errors of 20% or less were incurred when the 16O/18O ratios were less than three, even for peptides where the number of sulfur atoms was over- or under-estimated. These data demonstrate that for biomarker discovery, it is advantageous to label the proteome representing the disease state with 18O; and the method is not sensitive to variations in 18O1/18O2 ratio. This approach allows a comprehensive differentiation of expression levels and tentative identification via AMTs, followed by targeted analysis of over- and under-expressed peptides using tandem mass spectrometry, for applications such as the discovery of disease biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15047049     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2003.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  25 in total

1.  High-mass accuracy of product ions produced by SORI-CID using a dual electrospray ionization source coupled with FTICR mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J W Flora; J C Hannis; D C Muddiman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Comparative proteomics based on stable isotope labeling and affinity selection.

Authors:  Fred E Regnier; Larry Riggs; Roujian Zhang; Li Xiong; Peiran Liu; Asish Chakraborty; Erin Seeley; Cathy Sioma; Robert A Thompson
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.982

Review 3.  Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Michael B Goshe; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers.

Authors:  Manfred Heller; Hassan Mattou; Christoph Menzel; Xudong Yao
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions.

Authors:  M W Senko; S C Beu; F W McLaffertycor
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus.

Authors:  X Yao; A Freas; J Ramirez; P A Demirev; C Fenselau
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Protease-catalyzed incorporation of 18O into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Schnölzer; P Jedrzejewski; W D Lehmann
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Dissection of proteolytic 18O labeling: endoprotease-catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange of truncated peptide substrates.

Authors:  Xudong Yao; Carlos Afonso; Catherine Fenselau
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  An isotope coding strategy for proteomics involving both amine and carboxyl group labeling.

Authors:  Peiran Liu; Fred E Regnier
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: evaluation of endoprotease Glu-C as the catalytic agent.

Authors:  Kristy J Reynolds; Xudong Yao; Catherine Fenselau
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  20 in total

1.  ZoomQuant: an application for the quantitation of stable isotope labeled peptides.

Authors:  Brian D Halligan; Ronit Y Slyper; Simon N Twigger; Wayne Hicks; Michael Olivier; Andrew S Greene
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Simultaneous quantification and identification using 18O labeling with an ion trap mass spectrometer and the analysis software application "ZoomQuant".

Authors:  Wayne A Hicks; Brian D Halligan; Ronit Y Slyper; Simon N Twigger; Andrew S Greene; Michael Olivier
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Minimizing back exchange in 18O/16O quantitative proteomics experiments by incorporation of immobilized trypsin into the initial digestion step.

Authors:  Joel R Sevinsky; Kristy J Brown; Benjamin J Cargile; Jonathan L Bundy; James L Stephenson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  15N metabolic labeling of mammalian tissue with slow protein turnover.

Authors:  Daniel B McClatchy; Meng-Qiu Dong; Christine C Wu; John D Venable; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  An insight into high-resolution mass-spectrometry data.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; H R Bergen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 6.  18O stable isotope labeling in MS-based proteomics.

Authors:  Xiaoying Ye; Brian Luke; Thorkell Andresson; Josip Blonder
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2009-01-16

7.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview.

Authors:  Svitlana Rozanova; Katalin Barkovits; Miroslav Nikolov; Carla Schmidt; Henning Urlaub; Katrin Marcus
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 8.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Quantitative proteome analysis of human plasma following in vivo lipopolysaccharide administration using 16O/18O labeling and the accurate mass and time tag approach.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Qian; Matthew E Monroe; Tao Liu; Jon M Jacobs; Gordon A Anderson; Yufeng Shen; Ronald J Moore; David J Anderson; Rui Zhang; Steve E Calvano; Stephen F Lowry; Wenzhong Xiao; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Robust MS quantification method for phospho-peptides using 18O/16O labeling.

Authors:  Claus A Andersen; Stefano Gotta; Letizia Magnoni; Roberto Raggiaschi; Andreas Kremer; Georg C Terstappen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.