Literature DB >> 15907706

Simultaneous quantification and identification using 18O labeling with an ion trap mass spectrometer and the analysis software application "ZoomQuant".

Wayne A Hicks1, Brian D Halligan, Ronit Y Slyper, Simon N Twigger, Andrew S Greene, Michael Olivier.   

Abstract

Stable isotope labeling with (18)O is a promising technique for obtaining both qualitative and quantitative information from a single differential protein expression experiment. The small 4 Da mass shift produced by incorporation of two molecules of (18)O, and the lack of available methods for automated quantification of large data sets has limited the use of this approach with electrospray ionization-ion trap (ESI-IT) mass spectrometers. In this paper, we describe a method of acquiring ESI-IT mass spectrometric data that provides accurate calculation of relative ratios of peptides that have been differentially labeled using(18)O. The method utilizes zoom scans to provide high resolution data. This allows for accurate calculation of (18)O/(16)O ratios for peptides even when as much as 50% of a (18)O labeled peptide is present as the singly labeled species. The use of zoom scan data also provides sufficient resolution for calculating accurate ratios for peptides of +3 and lower charge states. Sequence coverage is comparable to that obtained with data acquisition modes that use only MS and MS/MS scans. We have employed a newly developed analysis software tool, ZoomQuant, which allows for the automated analysis of large data sets. We show that the combination of zoom scan data acquisition and analysis using ZoomQuant provides calculation of isotopic ratios accurate to approximately 21%. This compares well with data produced from (18)O labeling experiments using time of flight (TOF) and Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) MS instruments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15907706      PMCID: PMC2771642          DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  16 in total

1.  Inverse 18O labeling mass spectrometry for the rapid identification of marker/target proteins.

Authors:  Y K Wang; Z Ma; D F Quinn; E W Fu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers.

Authors:  Manfred Heller; Hassan Mattou; Christoph Menzel; Xudong Yao
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Approaching complete peroxisome characterization by gas-phase fractionation.

Authors:  Eugene C Yi; Marcello Marelli; Hookeun Lee; Samuel O Purvine; Ruedi Aebersold; John D Aitchison; David R Goodlett
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus.

Authors:  X Yao; A Freas; J Ramirez; P A Demirev; C Fenselau
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  18O labeling: a tool for proteomics.

Authors:  I I Stewart; T Thomson; D Figeys
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  High-throughput global peptide proteomic analysis by combining stable isotope amino acid labeling and data-dependent multiplexed-MS/MS.

Authors:  Scott J Berger; Sang-Won Lee; Gordon A Anderson; Lijana Pasa-Tolić; Nikola Tolić; Yufeng Shen; Rui Zhao; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  Michael P Washburn; Ryan Ulaszek; Cosmin Deciu; David M Schieltz; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Dissection of proteolytic 18O labeling: endoprotease-catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange of truncated peptide substrates.

Authors:  Xudong Yao; Carlos Afonso; Catherine Fenselau
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics.

Authors:  Shao-En Ong; Blagoy Blagoev; Irina Kratchmarova; Dan Bach Kristensen; Hanno Steen; Akhilesh Pandey; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  A method for calculating 16O/18O peptide ion ratios for the relative quantification of proteomes.

Authors:  Kenneth L Johnson; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  10 in total

1.  Proteomic analysis of shear stress-mediated protection from TNF-alpha in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Julie K Freed; Andrew S Greene
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Minimizing back exchange in 18O/16O quantitative proteomics experiments by incorporation of immobilized trypsin into the initial digestion step.

Authors:  Joel R Sevinsky; Kristy J Brown; Benjamin J Cargile; Jonathan L Bundy; James L Stephenson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Relative quantification of peptide phosphorylation in a complex mixture using 18O labeling.

Authors:  Julia R Smith; Michael Olivier; Andrew S Greene
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 4.  Methods and approaches for the comprehensive characterization and quantification of cellular proteomes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Shama P Mirza; Michael Olivier
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  18O labeling over a coffee break: a rapid strategy for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Shama P Mirza; Andrew S Greene; Michael Olivier
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Bi-Linear Regression for O Quantification: Modeling across the Elution Profile.

Authors:  Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Douglas W Mahoney; Ann L Oberg; Roman M Zenka; Kenneth L Johnson; K Sreekumaran Nair; Yogish C Kudva; H Robert Bergen; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2010-12-15

7.  Bioinformatics Tools for Mass Spectrometry-Based High-Throughput Quantitative Proteomics Platforms.

Authors:  Alexey V Nefedov; Miroslaw J Gilski; Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Curr Proteomics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.837

8.  Protease- and acid-catalyzed labeling workflows employing (18)O-enriched water.

Authors:  Diana Klingler; Markus Hardt
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Quantitative characterization of changes in the cardiac mitochondrial proteome during anesthetic preconditioning and ischemia.

Authors:  Martin Bienengraeber; Molly Pellitteri-Hahn; Naoyuki Hirata; Tesfaye M Baye; Zeljko J Bosnjak; Michael Olivier
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Quantifying raft proteins in neonatal mouse brain by 'tube-gel' protein digestion label-free shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Hongwei Yu; Bassam Wakim; Man Li; Brian Halligan; G Stephen Tint; Shailendra B Patel
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.480

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.