Literature DB >> 17068186

A method for automatically interpreting mass spectra of 18O-labeled isotopic clusters.

Christopher J Mason1, Terry M Therneau, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Kenneth L Johnson, Ann L Oberg, Janet E Olson, K Sreekumaran Nair, David C Muddiman, H Robert Bergen.   

Abstract

16O/18O labeling is one differential proteomics technology among many that promises diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of disease. Although the incorporation of 18O in the C-terminal carboxyl group during endoproteinase digestion in the presence of H2 18O makes the process of labeling facile, the ease and effectiveness of label incorporation have in some regards been outweighed by the difficulties in interpreting the resulting spectra. Complex isotope patterns result from the composition of unlabeled (18O(0)), singly labeled (18O(1)), and doubly labeled species (18O(2)) as well as contributions from the naturally occurring isotopes (e.g. 13C and 15N). Moreover because labeling is enzymatic, the number of 18O atoms incorporated can vary from peptide to peptide. Finally it is difficult to distinguish highly up-regulated from highly down-regulated or C-terminal peptides. We have developed an algorithm entitled regression analysis applied to mass spectrometry (RAAMS) that automatically, rapidly, and confidently interprets spectra of 18O-labeled peptides without requiring chemical composition information derived from product ion spectra. The algorithm is able to measure the effective 18O incorporation rate due to variable enzyme substrate specificity of the pseudosubstrate during the isotope exchange reaction and corrects for the 18O(0) abundance that remains in the labeled sample when using a two-step digestion/labeling procedure. We have also incorporated a method for distinguishing pure 18O(0) from pure 18O(2) peptides utilizing impure H2 18O. The algorithm operates on centroided peak lists and is therefore very fast: nine chromatograms of, on average, 1,168 spectra and containing, on average, 6,761 isotopic clusters were interpreted in, on average, 45 s per chromatogram. RAAMS is fast enough (average, 38 ms/spectrum) to allow the possibility of performing information-dependent MS/MS on a chromatographic time scale on species exceeding predetermined ratio thresholds. We describe in detail the operation of the algorithm and demonstrate its use on datasets with known and unknown ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068186     DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M600148-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  21 in total

1.  Deconvolution and database search of complex tandem mass spectra of intact proteins: a combinatorial approach.

Authors:  Xiaowen Liu; Yuval Inbar; Pieter C Dorrestein; Colin Wynne; Nathan Edwards; Puneet Souda; Julian P Whitelegge; Vineet Bafna; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA.

Authors:  Ann L Oberg; Douglas W Mahoney; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Christopher J Malone; Russell D Wolfinger; Elizabeth G Hill; Leslie T Cooper; Oyere K Onuma; Craig Spiro; Terry M Therneau; H Robert Bergen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  An insight into high-resolution mass-spectrometry data.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; H R Bergen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  18O stable isotope labeling in MS-based proteomics.

Authors:  Xiaoying Ye; Brian Luke; Thorkell Andresson; Josip Blonder
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2009-01-16

Review 5.  Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Fang Xie; Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian; Vladislav A Petyuk; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Quantification of isotopically overlapping deamidated and 18o-labeled peptides using isotopic envelope mixture modeling.

Authors:  Surendra Dasari; Phillip A Wilmarth; Ashok P Reddy; Lucinda J G Robertson; Srinivasa R Nagalla; Larry L David
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Large-scale multiplexed quantitative discovery proteomics enabled by the use of an (18)O-labeled "universal" reference sample.

Authors:  Wei-Jun Qian; Tao Liu; Vladislav A Petyuk; Marina A Gritsenko; Brianne O Petritis; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Amit Kaushal; Wenzhong Xiao; Celeste C Finnerty; Marc G Jeschke; Navdeep Jaitly; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  NITPICK: peak identification for mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Bernhard Y Renard; Marc Kirchner; Hanno Steen; Judith A J Steen; Fred A Hamprecht
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Robust MS quantification method for phospho-peptides using 18O/16O labeling.

Authors:  Claus A Andersen; Stefano Gotta; Letizia Magnoni; Roberto Raggiaschi; Andreas Kremer; Georg C Terstappen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.