Literature DB >> 21867836

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus.

Dimitri Kalavrouziotis1, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Rodrigo Bagur, Daniel Doyle, Robert De Larochellière, Philippe Pibarot, Eric Dumont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes among patients with a small aortic annulus who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were examined.
BACKGROUND: The presence of a small aortic annulus may complicate the surgical management of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). TAVI is an alternative to aortic valve replacement (AVR) in high-risk patients, but few data exist on the results of TAVI in patients with a small aortic annulus.
METHODS: Between 2007 and 2010, 35 patients (mean age 79.2 ± 9.4 years) with severe AS and an aortic annulus diameter <20 mm (mean 18.5 ± 0.9 mm) underwent TAVI with a 23-mm Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc., Irvine, California). Echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed prior to discharge and at 6, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 34 patients (97.1%). There was 1 in-hospital death. Peak and mean transaortic gradients decreased from 76.3 ± 33.0 mm Hg and 45.2 ± 20.6 mm Hg at baseline to 21.8 ± 8.4 mm Hg and 11.7 ± 4.8 mm Hg post-procedure, respectively, both p < 0.0001. Mean indexed effective orifice area (IEOA) increased from 0.35 ± 0.10 cm(2)/m(2) at baseline to 0.90 ± 0.18 cm(2)/m(2) post-procedure, p < 0.0001. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (IEOA <0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) occurred in 2 patients (5.9%). At a mean follow-up of 14 ± 11 months, gradients remained low and 30 of the 31 remaining survivors were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patients with severe AS and a small aortic annulus, TAVI is associated with good post-procedural valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. TAVI may provide a reasonable alternative to conventional AVR in elderly patients with a small aortic annulus.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21867836     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Marian Kukucka; Miralem Pasic; Stephan Dreysse; Semih Buz; Thorsten Drews; Alexander Mladenow; Helmut Habazettl; Hermann Kuppe; Axel Unbehaun; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

2.  Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Neil J Weissman; William J Stewart; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian R Lindman; Thomas McAndrew; Susheel K Kodali; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani; D Craig Miller; Lars G Svensson; Howard C Herrmann; Craig R Smith; Josep Rodés-Cabau; John Webb; Scott Lim; Ke Xu; Irene Hueter; Pamela S Douglas; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Comparison of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: a longitudinal study of echocardiography parameters in cohort A of the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valves).

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Philippe Pibarot; William J Stewart; Neil J Weissman; Deepika Gopalakrishnan; Martin G Keane; Saif Anwaruddin; Zuyue Wang; Martin Bilsker; Brian R Lindman; Howard C Herrmann; Susheel K Kodali; Raj Makkar; Vinod H Thourani; Lars G Svensson; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Martin B Leon; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Comparative imaging of cardiac structures and function for the optimization of transcatheter approaches for valvular and structural heart disease.

Authors:  Michael G Bateman; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Cristina da Silva; Anders Sahlen; Reidar Winter; Magnus Bäck; Andreas Rück; Magnus Settergren; Aristomenis Manouras; Kambiz Shahgaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

8.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Patients with Smaller Anatomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Ken Kozuma
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-09

Review 9.  Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline A Kim; Suraj P Rasania; Jonathan Afilalo; Jeffrey J Popma; Lewis A Lipsitz; Dae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Early and intermediate survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 studies.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Sabrina Trippoli; Fausto Biancari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.