BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to investigate the differences in corneal biomechanical parameters between healthy and exfoliation syndrome (EXS) and exfoliative glaucoma (EXG) patients. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four eyes of 102 healthy, 64 EXS, and 78 EXG patients were included in the study. Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences in ORA parameters between study and control group participants were analyzed using Student's t test. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, EXS and EXG eyes mean corneal hysteresis (CH) values were 9.4 ± 1.4 mmHg, 8.5 ± 1.5 mmHg and 6.9 ± 2.1 mmHg, respectively. The difference in mean CH between the EXG and the other two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). CH was significantly lower in EXS patients than that of healthy eyes (p < 0.001). Mean corneal resistance factor (CRF) values were 9.8 ± 1.6 mmHg, 9.3 ± 1.8 mmHg and 9.5 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively. Except for the difference between the control and EXS eyes (p = 0.004), no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in relation to mean CRF. There were no significant differences in CCT between the control eyes and exfoliative eyes with or without glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CH was found to be significantly lower in eyes with exfoliation. Further studies are needed to establish the relationships between exfoliation, ocular biomechanics, and glaucoma.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to investigate the differences in corneal biomechanical parameters between healthy and exfoliation syndrome (EXS) and exfoliative glaucoma (EXG) patients. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four eyes of 102 healthy, 64 EXS, and 78 EXG patients were included in the study. Corneal biomechanical parameters were measured using an ocular response analyzer (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences in ORA parameters between study and control group participants were analyzed using Student's t test. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, EXS and EXG eyes mean corneal hysteresis (CH) values were 9.4 ± 1.4 mmHg, 8.5 ± 1.5 mmHg and 6.9 ± 2.1 mmHg, respectively. The difference in mean CH between the EXG and the other two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). CH was significantly lower in EXS patients than that of healthy eyes (p < 0.001). Mean corneal resistance factor (CRF) values were 9.8 ± 1.6 mmHg, 9.3 ± 1.8 mmHg and 9.5 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively. Except for the difference between the control and EXS eyes (p = 0.004), no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in relation to mean CRF. There were no significant differences in CCT between the control eyes and exfoliative eyes with or without glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CH was found to be significantly lower in eyes with exfoliation. Further studies are needed to establish the relationships between exfoliation, ocular biomechanics, and glaucoma.
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Makoto Aihara; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Michael Sullivan-Mee; Shavon C Billingsley; Amita D Patel; Kathy D Halverson; Brooks R Alldredge; Clifford Qualls Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Thao N Yeh; Harry M Green; Yixiu Zhou; Julie Pitts; Britney Kitamata-Wong; Sophia Lee; Shiyin L Wang; Meng C Lin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 4.799