Literature DB >> 25813198

The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.

Simone Schaeffner1, Iring Koch2, Andrea M Philipp2.   

Abstract

Language processing requires the combination of compatible (auditory-vocal and visual-manual) or incompatible (auditory-manual and visual-vocal) sensory-motor modalities, and switching between these sensory-motor modality combinations is very common in every-day life. Sensory-motor modality compatibility is defined as the similarity of stimulus modality and the modality of response-related sensory consequences. We investigated the influence of sensory-motor modality compatibility during performing language-related cognitive operations on different linguistic levels. More specifically, we used a variant of the task-switching paradigm, in which participants had to switch between compatible or between incompatible sensory-motor modality combinations during a verbal semantic categorization (Experiment 1) or during a word-form decision (Experiment 2). The data show higher switch costs (i.e., higher reaction times and error rates in switch trials compared to repetition trials) in incompatible sensory-motor modality combinations than in compatible sensory-motor modality combinations. This was true for every language-related cognitive operation, regardless of the individual linguistic level. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that sensory-motor modality compatibility plays an important role in modality switching during language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25813198     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  22 in total

1.  Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

2.  Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Grounded cognition.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

6.  The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-21

Review 7.  A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-23

8.  Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing.

Authors:  Lea A Hald; Julie-Ann Marshall; Dirk P Janssen; Alan Garnham
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-18

9.  Modality Switching in a Property Verification Task: An ERP Study of What Happens When Candles Flicker after High Heels Click.

Authors:  Jennifer Collins; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-08

10.  Introduction to the special topic embodied and grounded cognition.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Diane Pecher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-08-17
View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching.

Authors:  Simone Schaeffner; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-24

2.  Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

3.  Exploring Modality Compatibility in the Response-Effect Compatibility Paradigm.

Authors:  Noémi Földes; Andrea M Philipp; Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.

Authors:  Jonathan C Rann; Amit Almor
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.