| Literature DB >> 21858550 |
Xueli Zhang1, Liang Wu, Youhua Sheng, Wenhua Zhou, Zhongming Huang, Jun Qu, Ganglong Gao, Duan Cai, Ming Zhang.
Abstract
Epidemiological studies found inconsistent results on the association of two variants on TGFBR1 (TGFBR1*6A and Int7G24A) with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The present study was aimed to evaluate the association of these two variants with CRC susceptibility via the meta-analysis methods. For variant TGFBR1*6A, nine reports including 6,765 CRC patients and 8,496 unrelated controls were identified. The heterozygotes *6A/*9A showed a significant increased risk of CRC with the pooled OR was 1.12 (95% CI = 1.02-1.23), and the pooled OR for the homozygotes *6A/*6A was 1.13 (95% CI = 0.80-1.58) compared to the homozygotes *9A/*9A. However, under the dominant effect model, the TGFBR1*6A carriers showed a significantly increased CRC risk (pooled OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03-1.23, *6A/*6A and *6A/*9A vs. *9A/*9A). For variant Int7G24A, three case-control studies with 1,074 cases and 1,945 controls were found. Although no significant association was found for heterozygosity Int7G24A carriers with CRC risk (pooled OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.67-1.42), the homozygosity A/A carriers showed a significant elevated risk of CRC (pooled OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.14-2.47) compared to G/G homozygotes. Under the recessive effect model, homozygotes A/A showed a 71% increase of CRC risk compared to the A/G and G/G genotype carriers (pooled OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17-2.51). These data strongly suggested that the two polymorphisms of TGFBR1 may confer low-penetrance susceptibility of CRC risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21858550 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1009-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Rep ISSN: 0301-4851 Impact factor: 2.316