Literature DB >> 25431216

Glenoid rim fracture through anchor points after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability.

Jin-Young Park1, Seung-Jun Lee, Se-Kwan Oh, KyungSoo Oh, YoungMin Noh, Kuen-Tak Suh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the incidence of postoperative glenoid rim fractures and analysed the relationships of glenoid rim fracture with osteolysis, fracture pattern, number of anchors and postoperative activity after arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchor fixation.
METHODS: Among 570 patients of the Bankart repair group, nine patients who had undergone revision arthroscopy for glenoid rim fracture after initial Bankart repair with at least two years post-revision follow-up were enrolled. Mean age was 28.8 years (range, 18-49 years), and mean follow-up was 36.4 months (range, 25-64 months). The mean time from Bankart repair to failure of initial surgery following trauma was 27.3 months (range, four to-84 months). Initial suture anchors were made of bioabsorbable composites (poly-D-L-lactic acid, PDLLA) without ceramic osteo-filler (seven cases) and metals (two cases). PDLLA without ceramic osteo-filler suture anchors were used for revision surgery. We reviewed 570 patients for relationship between osteolysis and glenoid rim fracture.
RESULTS: Five patients including three and two with bioabsorbable and metal suture anchors, respectively, experienced glenoid rim fracture at more than two years postoperatively. Osteolysis around initial suture anchors groups showed higher glenoid rim fracture incidence compared with the control group (odd ratio =4.186 [95 % CI, 1.108-15.818]; p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: Osteolysis related to insertion of metal or PLDDA suture anchors may lead to glenoid rim fracture. Remnant metal or bioabsorbable suture anchors without ceramic composite could be a stress riser at two years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25431216     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2604-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  32 in total

1.  Symptomatic interarticular migration of glenoid suture anchors.

Authors:  M D Silver; J P Daigneault
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Glenoid rim fracture after anchor repair: a report of 4 cases.

Authors:  Brett A Fritsch; Robert A Arciero; Dean C Taylor
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Extensive osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor: a case report.

Authors:  Dane Glueck; Timothy C Wilson; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Shyam M Shridharani; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors and associated accelerated shoulder arthropathy: report of 3 cases.

Authors:  Richard A Boden; Elizabeth Burgess; David Enion; Makaram S Srinivasan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Shane J Nho; Matthew T Provencher; Shane T Seroyer; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  In vivo evaluation of a porous hydroxyapatite/poly-DL-lactide composite for use as a bone substitute.

Authors:  Shin Hasegawa; Jiro Tamura; Masashi Neo; Koji Goto; Yasuo Shikinami; Makoto Saito; Masakazu Kita; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Just A van der Linde; Derk A van Kampen; Caroline B Terwee; Lea M Dijksman; G Kleinjan; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Bioabsorbable miniplating versus metallic fixation for metacarpal fractures.

Authors:  Eero Waris; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Harri Happonen; Timo Raatikainen; Outi Kaarela; Pertti Törmälä; Seppo Santavirta; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; C M Agrawal; F A Barber; S S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  5 in total

1.  Latarjet procedure: is the coracoid enough to restore the glenoid surface?

Authors:  Paolo Paladini; Rohit Singla; Giovanni Merolla; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does the immediate repair of Bankart lesion following first dislocation reduce the chances of recurrence after arthroscopic repair in soldiers?

Authors:  S K Rai; T P Gupta; Amit Kale; Omna Shaki
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-23

3.  Peri-anchor cyst formation after arthroscopic bankart repair: comparison between biocomposite suture anchor and all-suture anchor.

Authors:  Seokhwan Jin; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-11-27

4.  Serial Changes in Perianchor Cysts Following Arthroscopic Labral Repair Using All-Suture Anchors.

Authors:  Jae-Hoo Lee; Jun-Seok Kang; In Park; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-12-21

5.  Recovery of Shoulder Rotational Muscle Strength After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

Authors:  Masatoshi Amako; Hiroshi Arino; Yoshifumi Tsuda; Toyokazu Tsuchihara; Koichi Nemoto
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.