BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MDCT has some specific scan parameters that may systematically increase or decrease radiation dose to patients. This study explored the scan protocol parameters that impact radiation dose in temporal bone MDCT and determined the optimal scan parameters that balance radiation dose with diagnostic image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using exsomatized cadaveric heads, traditional axial scanning, and helical scanning were performed with different detector collimations. Helical scans of the same scan region were then acquired by using the determined optimal detector collimation and various tube voltages, whereas other scan parameters remained fixed. Next, the scans were repeated by using various tube current-time products by using the determined optimal tube voltage. Last, with fixed tube current-time product, the scans were repeated with various pitches. All thin-section, helically acquired scans were reformatted to axial and coronal images with respect to the relevant scanning baseline. In each of the image volumes, the mean and SD HU values in regions of interest were measured in the central section of the internal auditory canal, and CNR values were calculated. RESULTS: In agreement with theory, wider detector collimations such as 16 × 0.625 mm and 64 × 0.625 mm were associated with lower radiation doses than narrower collimations due to their lower overbeaming and higher geometric efficiency. In helical scanning, the detector collimation of 16 × 0.625 mm had higher image quality and the minimum DLP. Axial and coronal images acquired by using a 140-kVp tube voltage had significantly lower noise than scans acquired at 120 or 80 kVp with equivalent volume CT dose index. Diagnostic image quality was achieved when using a minimum tube current-time product of 120 mAs. Noise, CNR, and dose were jointly optimized with a pitch of 0.685. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal bone CT scanning parameters may be optimized by following a systematic procedure that allows for the optimization of diagnostic image quality and the minimization of radiation dose. One such procedure for a particular 64-section MDCT scanner has been presented.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MDCT has some specific scan parameters that may systematically increase or decrease radiation dose to patients. This study explored the scan protocol parameters that impact radiation dose in temporal bone MDCT and determined the optimal scan parameters that balance radiation dose with diagnostic image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using exsomatized cadaveric heads, traditional axial scanning, and helical scanning were performed with different detector collimations. Helical scans of the same scan region were then acquired by using the determined optimal detector collimation and various tube voltages, whereas other scan parameters remained fixed. Next, the scans were repeated by using various tube current-time products by using the determined optimal tube voltage. Last, with fixed tube current-time product, the scans were repeated with various pitches. All thin-section, helically acquired scans were reformatted to axial and coronal images with respect to the relevant scanning baseline. In each of the image volumes, the mean and SD HU values in regions of interest were measured in the central section of the internal auditory canal, and CNR values were calculated. RESULTS: In agreement with theory, wider detector collimations such as 16 × 0.625 mm and 64 × 0.625 mm were associated with lower radiation doses than narrower collimations due to their lower overbeaming and higher geometric efficiency. In helical scanning, the detector collimation of 16 × 0.625 mm had higher image quality and the minimum DLP. Axial and coronal images acquired by using a 140-kVp tube voltage had significantly lower noise than scans acquired at 120 or 80 kVp with equivalent volume CT dose index. Diagnostic image quality was achieved when using a minimum tube current-time product of 120 mAs. Noise, CNR, and dose were jointly optimized with a pitch of 0.685. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal bone CT scanning parameters may be optimized by following a systematic procedure that allows for the optimization of diagnostic image quality and the minimization of radiation dose. One such procedure for a particular 64-section MDCT scanner has been presented.
Authors: R Klingebiel; H C Bauknecht; P Rogalla; U Bockmühl; O Kaschke; M Werbs; R Lehmann Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: Marilyn J Siegel; Bernhard Schmidt; David Bradley; Christoph Suess; Charles Hildebolt Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Thomas G Flohr; Stefan Schaller; Karl Stierstorfer; Herbert Bruder; Bernd M Ohnesorge; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 11.105