Literature DB >> 21848463

Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

Anupam B Jena1, Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla, Amitabh Chandra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the proportion of physicians who face malpractice claims in a year, the size of those claims, and the cumulative career malpractice risk according to specialty.
METHODS: We analyzed malpractice data from 1991 through 2005 for all physicians who were covered by a large professional liability insurer with a nationwide client base (40,916 physicians and 233,738 physician-years of coverage). For 25 specialties, we reported the proportion of physicians who had malpractice claims in a year, the proportion of claims leading to an indemnity payment (compensation paid to a plaintiff), and the size of indemnity payments. We estimated the cumulative risk of ever being sued among physicians in high- and low-risk specialties.
RESULTS: Each year during the study period, 7.4% of all physicians had a malpractice claim, with 1.6% having a claim leading to a payment (i.e., 78% of all claims did not result in payments to claimants). The proportion of physicians facing a claim each year ranged from 19.1% in neurosurgery, 18.9% in thoracic-cardiovascular surgery, and 15.3% in general surgery to 5.2% in family medicine, 3.1% in pediatrics, and 2.6% in psychiatry. The mean indemnity payment was $274,887, and the median was $111,749. Mean payments ranged from $117,832 for dermatology to $520,923 for pediatrics. It was estimated that by the age of 65 years, 75% of physicians in low-risk specialties had faced a malpractice claim, as compared with 99% of physicians in high-risk specialties.
CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in the likelihood of malpractice suits and the size of indemnity payments across specialties. The cumulative risk of facing a malpractice claim is high in all specialties, although most claims do not lead to payments to plaintiffs. (Funded by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the National Institute on Aging.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21848463      PMCID: PMC3204310          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  16 in total

1.  The medical malpractice 'crisis': recent trends and the impact of state tort reforms.

Authors:  Kenneth E Thorpe
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Physicians' fears of malpractice lawsuits are not assuaged by tort reforms.

Authors:  Emily R Carrier; James D Reschovsky; Michelle M Mello; Ralph C Mayrell; David Katz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the National Practitioner Data Bank.

Authors:  Amitabh Chandra; Shantanu Nundy; Seth A Seabury
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Atul A Gawande; Tejal K Gandhi; Allen Kachalia; Catherine Yoon; Ann Louise Puopolo; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Malpractice liability costs and the practice of medicine in the Medicare program.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Elliott S Fisher; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The role of medical liability reform in federal health care reform.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Effects of tort reforms and other factors on medical malpractice insurance premiums.

Authors:  S Zuckerman; R R Bovbjerg; F Sloan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?

Authors:  F A Sloan; P M Mergenhagen; W B Burfield; R R Bovbjerg; M Hassan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; William M Sage; Catherine M DesRoches; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  National costs of the medical liability system.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Amitabh Chandra; Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  139 in total

1.  Commentary: physician apologies for adverse outcomes-beware the minefields of mea culpa.

Authors:  Patricia Legant
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Health care reform in the USA: Recommendations from USA and non-USA radiologists.

Authors:  Lauren Mb Burke; Diego R Martin; Till Bader; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28

3.  We Are Not Alone.

Authors:  S Mirbagheri; K Yousem; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.

Authors:  Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-09

5.  [Quality of anesthesiological expert opinion in medical claims cases].

Authors:  T Hachenberg; J Neu; S Werner; D Wiedemann; W Schaffartzik
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room.

Authors:  Martin Rohacek; Janet Buatsi; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Birgit Kleim; Heinz Zimmermann; Aristomenis Exadaktylos; Christoforos Stoupis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Medical malpractice claims related to cataract surgery complicated by retained lens fragments (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Judy E Kim; Paul Weber; Aniko Szabo
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2012-12

8.  Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases.

Authors:  Amad J Choudhry; Seema P Anandalwar; Asad J Choudhry; Peter F Svider; Joseph O Oliver; Jean Anderson Eloy; Ravi J Chokshi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Characteristics of Medical Liability Claims Against Dermatologists From 1991 Through 2015.

Authors:  Heather Kornmehl; Sanminder Singh; Brandon L Adler; Alexander E Wolf; Dean A Bochner; April W Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Litigations in orthopedics and trauma surgery: reasons, dynamics, and profiles.

Authors:  Martin Gathen; M Jaenisch; F Fuchs; L Weinhold; M Schmid; S Koob; D C Wirtz; M D Wimmer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.