PURPOSE: To identify reasons for ordering computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), to identify the frequency of reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior and evidence-based behavior, and to identify the impact of defensive medicine and of training about diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on positive results of CTPA. METHODS: Physicians in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital completed a questionnaire before CTPA after being trained about diagnosing PE and completing questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine hundred patients received a CTPA during 3 years. For 328 CTPAs performed during the 1-year study period, 140 (43 %) questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for ordering a CTPA were to confirm/rule out PE (93 %), elevated D-dimers (66 %), fear of missing PE (55 %), and Wells/simplified revised Geneva score (53 %). A positive answer for "fear of missing PE" was inversely associated with positive CTPA (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14-0.92, p = 0.033), and "Wells/simplified revised Geneva score" was associated with positive CTPA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.24-8.68, p = 0.017). The proportion of positive CTPA was higher if a questionnaire was completed, compared to the 2-year comparison period (26.4 vs. 14.5 %, OR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.36-3.29, p < 0.001). The proportion of positive CTPA was non-significantly higher during the study period than during the comparison period (19.2 vs. 14.5 %, OR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.98-2.0, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior-such as "fear of missing PE"-were frequent, and were associated with a decreased odds of positive CTPA. Defensive behavior might be modifiable by training in using guidelines.
PURPOSE: To identify reasons for ordering computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), to identify the frequency of reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior and evidence-based behavior, and to identify the impact of defensive medicine and of training about diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on positive results of CTPA. METHODS: Physicians in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital completed a questionnaire before CTPA after being trained about diagnosing PE and completing questionnaires. RESULTS: Nine hundred patients received a CTPA during 3 years. For 328 CTPAs performed during the 1-year study period, 140 (43 %) questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for ordering a CTPA were to confirm/rule out PE (93 %), elevated D-dimers (66 %), fear of missing PE (55 %), and Wells/simplified revised Geneva score (53 %). A positive answer for "fear of missing PE" was inversely associated with positive CTPA (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14-0.92, p = 0.033), and "Wells/simplified revised Geneva score" was associated with positive CTPA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.24-8.68, p = 0.017). The proportion of positive CTPA was higher if a questionnaire was completed, compared to the 2-year comparison period (26.4 vs. 14.5 %, OR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.36-3.29, p < 0.001). The proportion of positive CTPA was non-significantly higher during the study period than during the comparison period (19.2 vs. 14.5 %, OR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.98-2.0, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior-such as "fear of missing PE"-were frequent, and were associated with a decreased odds of positive CTPA. Defensive behavior might be modifiable by training in using guidelines.
Authors: M Di Nisio; A Squizzato; A W S Rutjes; H R Büller; A H Zwinderman; P M M Bossuyt Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: David A Katz; Geoffrey C Williams; Roger L Brown; Tom P Aufderheide; Mark Bogner; Peter S Rahko; Harry P Selker Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; William M Sage; Catherine M DesRoches; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert; Troyen A Brennan Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Katherine Sward; Alan Morris; J Michael Dean; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Frederikus A Klok; Inge C M Mos; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Marc Righini; Arnaud Perrier; Grégoire Le Gal; Menno V Huisman Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-10-27
Authors: Carmen A Pfortmueller; Gregor Lindner; Georg-Christian Funk; Alexander B Leichtle; Georg M Fiedler; Christoph Schwarz; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Megan Salwei; Douglas Wiegmann; Roger L Brown; Peter Kleinschmidt; Clair Novak; Michael Pulia; Yudi Wang; Emily Wirkus; Brian Patterson Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Sean K Golden; John B Harringa; Perry J Pickhardt; Alexander Ebinger; James E Svenson; Ying-Qi Zhao; Zhanhai Li; Ryan P Westergaard; William J Ehlenbach; Michael D Repplinger Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Martin Rohacek; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Carmen A Pfortmüller; Heinz Zimmermann; Aristomenis Exadaktylos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240