Literature DB >> 22423317

Health care reform in the USA: Recommendations from USA and non-USA radiologists.

Lauren Mb Burke1, Diego R Martin, Till Bader, Richard C Semelka.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the opinions and recommendations of imaging specialists from United States (USA) and non-USA developed nations for USA health care reform.
METHODS: A survey was emailed out to 18 imaging specialists from 17 non-USA developed nation countries and 14 radiologists within the USA regarding health care reform. The questionnaire contained the following questions: what are the strengths of your health care system, what problems are present in your nation's health care system, and what recommendations do you have for health care reform in the USA. USA and non-USA radiologists received the same questionnaire.
RESULTS: Strengths of the USA health care system include high quality care, autonomy, and access to timely care. Twelve of 14 (86%) USA radiologists identified medicolegal action as a major problem in their health care system and felt that medicolegal reform was a critical aspect of health care reform. None of the non-USA radiologists identified medicolegal aspects as a problem in their own country nor identified it as a subject for USA health care reform. Eleven of 14 (79%) USA radiologists and 16/18 (89%) non-USA radiologists identified universal health care coverage as an important recommendation for reform.
CONCLUSION: Without full universal coverage, meaningful health care reform will likely require medicolegal reform as an early and important aspect of improved and efficient health care.

Keywords:  Health care policy; Health care reform

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423317      PMCID: PMC3304092          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i2.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  20 in total

1.  Malpractice reform.

Authors:  Richard M Friedenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Policy makers should prepare for major uncertainties in Medicaid enrollment, costs, and needs for physicians under health reform.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sommers; Katherine Swartz; Arnold Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Is computed tomography safe?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Invited commentary--it is time to address the costs of defensive medicine: comment on "physicians' views on defensive medicine: a national survey".

Authors:  Sen Orrin G Hatch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-28

Review 5.  Effects of the medical liability system in Australia, the UK, and the USA.

Authors:  Daniel P Kessler; Nicholas Summerton; John R Graham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The role of medical liability reform in federal health care reform.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Seth Seabury; Darius Lakdawalla; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Young adults and the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

Authors:  Sara R Collins; Jennifer L Nicholson
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2010-10

10.  Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD).

Authors:  Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.