Literature DB >> 2585673

Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?

F A Sloan1, P M Mergenhagen, W B Burfield, R R Bovbjerg, M Hassan.   

Abstract

This study uses a large malpractice database from Florida to assess the concentration of losses among physicians, predictability of claims experience, characteristics of physicians with favorable vs unfavorable experience, and effects of claims experience on physicians' practice decisions and on actions taken by the state's licensing board. Most payments by insurers involved a comparatively small number of physicians. Physicians with relatively prestigious credentials had no better, and on some indicators, worse claims experience. If anything, physicians with adverse claims experience were less likely to make subsequent changes in their practice, such as quitting practice or moving to another state. Physicians with very poor claims histories were more likely to have complaints filed against them with the Florida licensing board, but the sanctions against physicians with either poor or excellent histories were not severe. Physicians with adverse claims experience from incidents that arose between 1975 and 1980 had appreciably worse claims experience from incidents that arose during 1981 to 1983.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2585673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  20 in total

1.  Medical malpractice among physicians: who will be sued and who will pay?

Authors:  D A Weycker; G A Jensen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-09

2.  Erring and learning in clinical practice.

Authors:  Brian Hurwitz
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Predicting risk for medical malpractice claims using quality-of-care characteristics.

Authors:  S C Charles; R D Gibbons; P R Frisch; C E Pyskoty; D Hedeker; N K Singha
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-10

4.  Medical school attended as a predictor of medical malpractice claims.

Authors:  T M Waters; F V Lefevre; P P Budetti
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10

5.  The epidemiology of malpractice.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-29

Review 6.  Act first and look up the law afterward?: medical malpractice and the ethics of defensive medicine.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

7.  Surgeon demographics and medical malpractice in adult reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian J McGrory; B Sonny Bal; Sally York; William Macaulay; David B McConnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medical malpractice claims related to cataract surgery complicated by retained lens fragments (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Judy E Kim; Paul Weber; Aniko Szabo
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2012-12

9.  Medical professional liability risk among US cardiologists.

Authors:  Sandeep Mangalmurti; Seth A Seabury; Amitabh Chandra; Darius Lakdawalla; William J Oetgen; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Seth Seabury; Darius Lakdawalla; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.