Literature DB >> 21847556

Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).

Mahmoud Mustafa1.   

Abstract

We determined whether the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features on the preoperative urography (IVP) are enough to predict fragments clearance after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). A Total of 282 patients with mean age 45.8 ± 13.2 years (189 male, 93 female), who underwent SWL due to renal calculi between October 2005 and August 2009 were enrolled. The mean calculi load was 155.72 ± 127.66 mm². The patients were stratified into three groups: patients with pelvis calculi (group 1); patients with upper or middle pole calculi (group 2) and patients with lower pole calculi (group 3). Three angles on the pretreatment IVP were measured: the inner angle between the axis of the lower pole infundibular and ureteropelvic axis (angle I); the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and main axis of pelvis-ureteropelvic (UP) junction point (angle II) and the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and perpendicular line (angle III). Multivariate analysis was used to define the significant predictors of stone clearance. The overall success rate was 85.81%. All angles, sessions number, shock waves number and stone burden were significant predictors of success in patients in group 1. However, in group 2 only angle II and in group 3 angles I and II had significant effect on stone clearance. Radiographic anatomic features have significant role in determining the stone-free rate following satisfactory fragmentation of renal stones with SWL. The measurement of infundibulopelvic angle in different manner helps to predict the stone-free status in patients with renal calculi located not only in lower pole, but also in renal pelvis and upper or middle pole. Gravity effect is not enough to justify the significant influence of the radiographic anatomic features on the stone clearance and fragments retention after SWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847556     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0412-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  14 in total

1.  Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle.

Authors:  F X Keeley; S A Moussa; G Smith; D A Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Renal collecting system anatomy: its possible role in the effectiveness of renal stone treatment.

Authors:  F J Sampaio
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; A H Aragao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.

Authors:  A M Elbahnasy; A L Shalhav; D M Hoenig; O M Elashry; D S Smith; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; A H Aragao
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N P Gupta; D V Singh; A K Hemal; S Mandal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Khalek; Khaled Z Sheir; Alaa A Mokhtar; Ibrahiem Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy; Mahmoud Bazeed
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004

9.  Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Mustafa Kirac; Metin Onaran; Ustunol Karaoglan; Nuri Deniz; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-03-04

10.  Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: a multivariate analysis model.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed E Abo-Elghar; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud R El-Kenawy; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2006-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.