Literature DB >> 17619706

Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: a multivariate analysis model.

Ahmed El-Assmy1, Ahmed R El-Nahas, Mohamed E Abo-Elghar, Ibrahim Eraky, Mahmoud R El-Kenawy, Khaled Z Sheir.   

Abstract

The first-line management of renal stones between 20-30 mm remains controversial. The Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) stone-free rates for such patient groups vary widely. The purpose of this study was to define factors that have a significant impact on the stone-free rate after ESWL in such controversial groups. Between January 1990 and January 2004, 594 patients with renal stones 20-30 mm in length underwent ESWL monotherapy. Stone surface area was measured for all stones. The results of treatment were evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. The stone-free rate was correlated with stone and patient characteristics using the Chi-square test; factors found to be significant were further analyzed using multivariate analysis. Repeat ESWL was needed in 56.9% of cases. Post-ESWL complications occurred in 5% of cases and post-ESWL secondary procedures were required in 5.9%. At 3-month follow-up, the overall stone-free rate was 77.2%. Using the Chi-square test, stone surface area, location, number, radiological renal picture, and congenital renal anomalies had a significant impact on the stone-free rate. Multivariate analysis excluded radiological renal picture from the logistic regression model while other factors maintained their statistically significant effect on success rate, indicating that they were independent predictors. A regression analysis model was designed to estimate the probability of stone-free status after ESWL. The sensitivity of the model was 97.4%, the specificity 90%, and the overall accuracy 95.6%. Stone surface area, location, number, and congenital renal anomalies are prognostic predictors determining stone clearance after ESWL of renal calculi of 20-30 mm. High probability of stone clearance is obtained with single stone < or = 400 mm2 located in renal pelvis with no congenital anomalies. Our regression model can predict the probability of the success of ESWL in such controversial groups and can define patients who would need other treatment modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17619706      PMCID: PMC5917376          DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2006.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach.

Authors:  Ryoji Takazawa; Sachi Kitayama; Toshihiko Tsujii
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

2.  Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-17

3.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.

Authors:  Nevzat Can Sener; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu; Okan Bas; Ufuk Ozturk; H N Goksel Goktug; Can Tuygun; Hasan Bakirtas
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mohamed Gadelmoula; Ahmad A Elderwy; Islam F Abdelkawi; Ahmed M Moeen; Ghaleb Althamthami; Ahmed M Abdel-Moneim
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

5.  A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study.

Authors:  Reihaneh Moghisi; Christo El Morr; Kenneth T Pace; Mohammad Hajiha; Jimmy Huang
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2022-03-16

6.  Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Gholamreza Mokhtari; Atiyeh Amin; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Samaneh Esmaeili; Nadia Rastjou Herfeh; Reza Falahatkar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone.

Authors:  Mohammed Hassan; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Khaled Z Sheir; Nasr A El-Tabey; Ahmed M El-Assmy; Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-06-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.