Literature DB >> 2184569

Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors.

L X Yao1, J A Zagzebski, E L Madsen.   

Abstract

In previous work, we demonstrated that accurate backscatter coefficient measurements are obtained with a data reduction method that explicitly accounts for experimental factors involved in recording echo data. An alternative, relative processing method for determining the backscatter coefficient and the attenuation coefficient is presented here. This method involves comparison of echo data from a sample with data recorded from a reference phantom whose backscatter and attenuation coefficients are known. A time domain processing technique is used to extract depth and frequency dependent signal ratios for the sample and the reference phantom. The attenuation coefficient and backscatter coefficient of the sample are found from these ratios. The method is tested using tissue-mimicking phantoms with known scattering and attenuation properties.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2184569     DOI: 10.1177/016173469001200105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  104 in total

1.  Relationships of quantitative ultrasound parameters with cancellous bone microstructure in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Sheng L Gibson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.

Authors:  Yassin Labyed; Timothy A Bigelow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Chandra Karunakaran; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  A Pilot Comparative Study of Quantitative Ultrasound, Conventional Ultrasound, and MRI for Predicting Histology-Determined Steatosis Grade in Adult Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Jeremy S Paige; Gregory S Bernstein; Elhamy Heba; Eduardo A C Costa; Marilia Fereirra; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Mark A Valasek; Grace Y Lin; Aiguo Han; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien; Michael P Andre; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Contrast ultrasound imaging of the aorta alters vascular morphology and circulating von Willebrand factor in hypercholesterolemic rabbits.

Authors:  Brendon W Smith; Douglas G Simpson; Sandhya Sarwate; Rita J Miller; James P Blue; Alexander Haak; William D O'Brien; John W Erdman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization via 2-D spectrum analysis: theory and in vitro measurements.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Frederic L Lizzi; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Ronald H Silverman; Gerald J Kutcher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Eenas A Omari; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen; Gary Frank
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Alexander D Pawlicki; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.