Literature DB >> 23493613

Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Kibo Nam1, James A Zagzebski, Timothy J Hall.   

Abstract

Clinical analysis of breast ultrasound imaging is done qualitatively, facilitated with the ultrasound breast imaging-reporting and data system (US BI-RADS) lexicon, which helps to standardize imaging assessments. Two descriptors in that lexicon, "posterior acoustic features" and the "echo pattern" within a mass, are directly related to quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters, namely, ultrasound attenuation and the average backscatter coefficient (BSC). The purpose of this study was to quantify ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast masses and to investigate these QUS properties as potential differential diagnostic markers. Radio frequency (RF) echo signals were from patients with breast masses during a special ultrasound imaging session prior to core biopsy. Data were also obtained from a well characterized phantom using identical system settings. Masses include 14 fibroadenomas and 10 carcinomas. Attenuation for the acoustic path lying proximal to the tumor was estimated offline using a least squares method with constraints. BSCs were estimated using a reference phantom method (RPM). The attenuation coefficient within each mass was assessed using both the RPM and a hybrid method, and effective scatterer diameters (ESDs) were estimated using a Gaussian form factor model. Attenuation estimates obtained with the RPM were consistent with estimates done using the hybrid method in all cases except for two masses. The mean slope of the attenuation coefficient versus frequency for carcinomas was 20% greater than the mean slope value for the fibroadenomas. The product of the attenuation coefficient and anteroposterior dimension of the mass was computed to estimate the total attenuation for each mass. That value correlated well with the BI-RADS assessment of "posterior acoustic features" judged qualitatively from gray scale images. Nearly all masses were described as "hypoechoic," so no strong statements could be made about the correlation of echo pattern findings in BI-RADS with the averaged BSC values. However, most carcinomas exhibited lower values for the frequency-average BSC than fibroadenomas. The mean ESD alone did not differentiate the mass type, but fibroadenomas had greater variability in ESDs within the ROI than that found for invasive ductal carcinomas. This study demonstrates the potential to use attenuation and QUS parameters associated with the BSC as quantitative descriptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23493613      PMCID: PMC3676873          DOI: 10.1177/0161734613480281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  38 in total

1.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using 2-D spectrum analysis and its application in ocular tumor diagnosis.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Frederic L Lizzi; Ronald H Silverman; Gerald J Kutcher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Ultrasonic computed tomography reconstruction of the attenuation coefficient using a linear array.

Authors:  Sheng-Wen Huang; Pai-Chi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Parametric ultrasound imaging from backscatter coefficient measurements: image formation and interpretation.

Authors:  M F Insana; T J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 5.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  Dependence of ultrasonic attenuation on bone mass and microstructure in bovine cortical bone.

Authors:  Magali Sasso; Guillaume Haïat; Yu Yamato; Salah Naili; Mami Matsukawa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography?

Authors:  V P Jackson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Differentiation of breast tumors by ultrasonic tissue characterization.

Authors:  R M Golub; R E Parsons; B Sigel; E J Feleppa; J Justin; H A Zaren; M Rorke; J Sokil-Melgar; H Kimitsuki
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features.

Authors:  Régis Resende Paulinelli; Ruffo Freitas-Júnior; Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira; Vardeli Alves de Moraes; Júlio Roberto M Bernardes-Júnior; Célio da Silva Rocha Vidal; Alessandro Naldi Ruiz; Miliana Tostes Lucato
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.

Authors:  L Liberman; A F Abramson; F B Squires; J R Glassman; E A Morris; D D Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  22 in total

1.  Spectral analysis framework for compressed sensing ultrasound signals.

Authors:  Jaeyoon Shim; Don Hur; Hyungsuk Kim
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Low Variance Estimation of Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound Parameters Using Dynamic Programming.

Authors:  Zara Vajihi; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Timothy J Hall; Hassan Rivaz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.

Authors:  Eenas A Omari; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.

Authors:  Haidy G Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Fine-tuning the H-scan for discriminating changes in tissue scatterers.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Jihye Baek
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers Based on Backscattered Acoustic Power: Potential for Quantifying Remodeling of the Human Cervix during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hallcor
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

8.  Beyond Cervical Length: A Pilot Study of Ultrasonic Attenuation for Early Detection of Preterm Birth Risk.

Authors:  Barbara L McFarlin; Viksit Kumar; Timothy A Bigelow; Douglas G Simpson; Rosemary C White-Traut; Jacques S Abramowicz; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.

Authors:  Haidy Gerges Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.