Literature DB >> 22779499

Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.

Goutam Ghoshal1, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic attenuation is important not only as a parameter for characterizing tissue but also for compensating other parameters that are used to classify tissues. Several techniques have been explored for estimating ultrasonic attenuation from backscattered signals. In the present study, a technique is developed to estimate the local ultrasonic attenuation coefficient by analyzing the time domain backscattered signal. The proposed method incorporates an objective function that combines the diffraction pattern of the source/receiver with the attenuation slope in an integral equation. The technique was assessed through simulations and validated through experiments with a tissue mimicking phantom and fresh rabbit liver samples. The attenuation values estimated using the proposed technique were compared with the attenuation estimated using insertion loss measurements. For a data block size of 15 pulse lengths axially and 15 beamwidths laterally, the mean attenuation estimates from the tissue mimicking phantoms were within 10% of the estimates using insertion loss measurements. With a data block size of 20 pulse lengths axially and 20 beamwidths laterally, the error in the attenuation values estimated from the liver samples were within 10% of the attenuation values estimated from the insertion loss measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22779499      PMCID: PMC3407163          DOI: 10.1121/1.4728195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Ultrasound attenuation estimation in soft tissue using the entropy difference of pulsed echoes between two adjacent envelope segments.

Authors:  H S Jang; T K Song; S B Park
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Theoretical estimation of the temperature dependence of backscattered ultrasonic power for noninvasive thermometry.

Authors:  W L Straube; R M Arthur
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in liver tissue.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Method of data reduction for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients.

Authors:  E L Madsen; M F Insana; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in mammalian tissues.

Authors:  R C Chivers; R J Parry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Clinical application of an ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation technique for liver pathology characterization.

Authors:  R Kuc
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Inadequate dietary magnesium intake increases atherosclerotic plaque development in rabbits.

Authors:  Jennifer L King; Rita J Miller; James P Blue; William D O'Brien; John W Erdman
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images-Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared.

Authors:  Dinah Maria Brandner; Xiran Cai; Josquin Foiret; Katherine W Ferrara; Bernhard G Zagar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.