Literature DB >> 21843684

Medical vs. surgical abortion: the importance of women's choice.

Caroline Moreau1, James Trussell, Julie Desfreres, Nathalie Bajos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using a large national sample of women undergoing an abortion in France, we explore the factors associated with medical or surgical abortion. We draw particular attention to the influence of women's preferences in the decision-making process. STUDY
DESIGN: The data are drawn from a nationally representative survey of 8,245 women undergoing an elective abortion in France in 2007. Analyses of factors associated with the type of abortion technique were performed among the 4,650 women who were identified as being eligible for the two techniques.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of all abortions were medical procedures among women eligible for both techniques. The type of abortion technique was not dependent on women's age, parity, cohabitation status, socioeconomic circumstances nor on the type of facility providing the abortion (private or public). Conversely, women's participation in the decision-making process was strongly associated with the type of abortion method. Among the 50% of women who reported they had been given a choice, 84% underwent a medical procedure vs. 52% of those who were not offered a choice. Among the 2,286 women who were not involved in the decision, 35% indicated they trusted their doctor to make the best choice for them, while 44% were told it was too late for a medical procedure, although they had consulted before 8 weeks of amenorrhea.
CONCLUSION: In this sample of French women who participated in a national survey on abortion, those who were involved in the decision-making process as to whether to have a medical or surgical procedure showed a strong preference for the medical procedure.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21843684      PMCID: PMC3703632          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  12 in total

Review 1.  Medical termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  S Christin-Maitre; P Bouchard; I M Spitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Motivation and satisfaction with early medical vs. surgical abortion in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Olga E Loeber
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2010-05

3.  Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study.

Authors:  Christina Rørbye; Mogens Nørgaard; Lisbeth Nilas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Choices about abortion method: assessing the quality of patient information leaflets in England and Wales.

Authors:  Sandra S M Wong; Hilary L Bekker; Jim G Thornton; Babatunde A Gbolade
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

Authors:  S T Cameron; A F Glasier; J Logan; L Benton; D T Baird
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-12

6.  Conditions for choosing between drug-induced and surgical abortions.

Authors:  A Bachelot; L Cludy; A Spira
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Assessing strength of preference for abortion method using 'willingness to pay': a useful research technique for measuring values.

Authors:  S Gibb; C Donaldson; R Henshaw
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Patterns of contraceptive use before and after an abortion: results from a nationally representative survey of women undergoing an abortion in France.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Julie Desfreres; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.

Authors:  R C Henshaw; S A Naji; I T Russell; A A Templeton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-18

10.  A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  P Slade; S Heke; J Fletcher; P Stewart
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Quality of Care in a Safe-Abortion Hotline in Indonesia: Beyond Harm Reduction.

Authors:  Caitlin Gerdts; Inna Hudaya
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Contraceptive paths of adolescent women undergoing an abortion in France.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of international implementation and challenges.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Mollie A Minear; Elisa Berson; Shilpa Sridhar; Margaret Rote; Anthony Hung; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-16

4.  Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids.

Authors:  Kyla Z Donnelly; Rachel Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Improving access to safe abortion in a rural primary care setting in India: experience of a service delivery intervention.

Authors:  Kirti Iyengar; Sharad D Iyengar
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Results from a study using misoprostol for management of incomplete abortion in Vietnamese hospitals: implications for task shifting.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoc; Tara Shochet; Jennifer Blum; Pham Thanh Hai; Duong Lan Dung; Tran Thanh Nhan; Beverly Winikoff
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Quantity over quality-Findings from a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids on early abortion methods.

Authors:  Kyla Z Donnelly; Glyn Elwyn; Rachel Thompson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Sociodemographic Characteristics of Women Able to Obtain Medication Abortion Before and After Ohio's Law Requiring Use of the Food and Drug Administration Protocol.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Nicole E Johns; Alice F Cartwright; Tanya E Franklin
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-07-01

9.  A Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mifepristone-Misoprostol Medical Abortions in the First Year at the Regina General Hospital.

Authors:  Caitlin Hunter; Joshua Jensen; Biaka Imeah; Michelle McCarron; Megan Clark
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2020-08-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.