Literature DB >> 22443844

Contraceptive paths of adolescent women undergoing an abortion in France.

Caroline Moreau1, James Trussell, Nathalie Bajos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although more than 30,000 teenagers had an induced abortion in France in 2007 (14.3% of all abortions), little is known about their abortion experience. We explore young women's decisions related to their abortion and the patterns of abortion care among teenagers in France, and draw particular attention to the contraceptive circumstances surrounding the abortion.
METHODS: The data are drawn from the French National Survey of Abortion Patients conducted in 2007, comprising 1,525 women aged 13-19 years.
RESULTS: A majority of French teens (82%) reported their pregnancy was unplanned and took on the responsibility of having an abortion: 45% made the decision alone, 46% shared the decision with their family or partner, and 9% reported the decision was made on their family's or partner's request alone. Sixty-nine percent of teenagers were eligible for both medical and surgical abortions, but only 43% thought they were given a choice of methods. Two-thirds of pregnancies were caused by contraceptive misuse or failure, mostly due to condom slippage or breakage (26%) or inconsistent pill use (20%). In 68% of cases, teenagers were prescribed a more effective method than the one they were using before, although only 11% received a prescription for a long-acting method. One in five teenagers reported not receiving a prescription for contraception.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal varying degrees of young women's autonomy in the decisions regarding their abortion. Although most teens switch to more effective methods of contraception after an abortion, only a minority receives a prescription for a long-acting method. Copyright Â
© 2012 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22443844      PMCID: PMC3646385          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  18 in total

1.  Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study.

Authors:  Christina Rørbye; Mogens Nørgaard; Lisbeth Nilas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Contraceptive failure rates in France: results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  C Moreau; J Trussell; G Rodriguez; N Bajos; J Bouyer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Acute and long-term consequences of adolescents who choose abortions.

Authors:  F M Biro; L S Wildey; P J Hillard; J Rauh
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.132

4.  Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Lori F Frohwirth; Lindsay A Dauphinee; Susheela Singh; Ann M Moore
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  [Prevention of unintended pregnancies: toward a dual protection at sexual debut?].

Authors:  N Beltzer; C Moreau; N Bajos
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 1.019

6.  Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; D Grady; K Kerlikowske; D A Grimes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Medical vs. surgical abortion: the importance of women's choice.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Julie Desfreres; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.

Authors:  R C Henshaw; S A Naji; I T Russell; A A Templeton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-18

9.  A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.

Authors:  P Slade; S Heke; J Fletcher; P Stewart
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-12

10.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Fertility Desire, Unprotected Sex, and Detectable Viral Load in HIV-Positive Female Sex Workers in Mombasa, Kenya.

Authors:  Kate S Wilson; George Wanje; Linnet Masese; Jane M Simoni; Juma Shafi; Lucy Adala; Julie Overbaugh; Walter Jaoko; Barbra A Richardson; Raymond S McClelland
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Timing of contraceptive initiation and association with future sexual and reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  Kimberley True; Nathalie Bajos; Aline Bohet; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France.

Authors:  Ramona Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Contraceptive Use Before and After Abortion: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nigeria and Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Sophia Magalona; Meagan Byrne; Funmilola M OlaOlorun; Rosine Mosso; Elizabeth Omoluabi; Caroline Moreau; Suzanne O Bell
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2022-07-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.