Literature DB >> 15618257

Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study.

Christina Rørbye1, Mogens Nørgaard, Lisbeth Nilas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare satisfaction with medical and surgical abortion and to identify potential confounders affecting satisfaction.
METHODS: 1033 women with gestational age (GA) < or = 63 days had either a medical (600 mg mifepristone followed by 1 mg gemeprost) or a surgical abortion (vacuum aspiration in general anaesthesia). The procedure was determined either by randomization (n = 111) or by choice (n = 922). Data on satisfaction, side effects and expectations were collected from questionnaires 2 and 8 weeks after termination.
RESULTS: More women were very satisfied or satisfied after a surgical than a medical abortion both after choosing method (92% vs 82%, P < 0.0001), and after randomization (94% vs 68%, P < 0.001). Satisfaction was higher after choosing a medical procedure than after randomization to the same procedure; 82% and 68%, respectively, P < 0.05. Satisfaction with the medical procedure was inversely correlated with GA and the intensity of pain, nausea, vomiting and dizziness, while satisfaction with the surgical procedure was unaffected by these side effects. Fewer women with a failed medical than a failed surgical abortion were satisfied (17% vs 62%), P < 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with both medical and surgical abortions is high, although higher with the surgical than the medical procedure, and higher after choosing method than after randomization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15618257     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes for patients with the same disease treated inside and outside of randomized trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natasha Fernandes; Dianne Bryant; Lauren Griffith; Mohamed El-Rabbany; Nisha M Fernandes; Crystal Kean; Jacquelyn Marsh; Siddhi Mathur; Rebecca Moyer; Clare J Reade; John J Riva; Lyndsay Somerville; Neera Bhatnagar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Contraceptive paths of adolescent women undergoing an abortion in France.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Medical vs. surgical abortion: the importance of women's choice.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; James Trussell; Julie Desfreres; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Clients' perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico city's public-sector legal abortion program.

Authors:  Davida Becker; Claudia Díaz-Olavarrieta; Clara Juárez; Sandra G García; Patricio Sanhueza; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-12

5.  Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Undesired Pregnancy of Unknown Location.

Authors:  Alisa B Goldberg; Isabel R Fulcher; Jennifer Fortin; Rebecca K Hofer; Alex Cottrill; Divya Dethier; Allison Gilbert; Elizabeth Janiak; Danielle Roncari
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  Validation of a Spanish-language scale for evaluating perceived quality of care of medical abortions before 9 weeks gestation.

Authors:  Rosa Cabedo-Ferreiro; Maria-Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Josep-Maria Manresa-Domínguez; Miriam Gómez-Masvidal; Laura Montero-Pons; Azahara Reyes-Lacalle; Gemma Falguera-Puig
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  The influence of pregnancy termination on the outcome of subsequent pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Brenda L Scholten; Godelieve C M L Page-Christiaens; Arie Franx; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Client preferences and acceptability for medical abortion and MVA as early pregnancy termination method in northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mulatu A Woldetsadik; Tegbar Y Sendekie; Mary T White; Desalegn T Zegeye
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Kathrine Carstensen; Ida Vogel; Lone Hvidman; Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen; Maja Lanther; Olav Bjørn Petersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.