Caitlin Gerdts1, Inna Hudaya1. 1. Caitlin Gerdts is with Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA. Inna Hudaya is with Samsara, Indonesia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine services offered by safe-abortion hotlines in contexts in which abortion is legally restricted and to document the experiences of women contacting a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia. METHODS: We analyzed 1829 first-time contacts to a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia as a part of routine service provision between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: Nearly one third (29.9%) of initial contacts reported their age as between 18 and 24 years, and most (51.2%) reported being unmarried. When asked about their reason for calling the hotline, the majority of initial contacts stated that they were pregnant and not ready to have a child. More than one third reported gestational ages below 12 weeks, and nearly one fifth (18.3%) reported a gestation of 13 weeks or greater. CONCLUSIONS: These unique data provide a window of understanding into who contacts safe-abortion hotlines and why, and enable exploration of future directions for research on the role of safe-abortion hotlines in women's access to safe abortion. Public Health Implications. Safe-abortion hotlines should be evaluated not only for reducing harm but also for providing high-quality abortion care.
OBJECTIVES: To examine services offered by safe-abortion hotlines in contexts in which abortion is legally restricted and to document the experiences of women contacting a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia. METHODS: We analyzed 1829 first-time contacts to a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia as a part of routine service provision between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: Nearly one third (29.9%) of initial contacts reported their age as between 18 and 24 years, and most (51.2%) reported being unmarried. When asked about their reason for calling the hotline, the majority of initial contacts stated that they were pregnant and not ready to have a child. More than one third reported gestational ages below 12 weeks, and nearly one fifth (18.3%) reported a gestation of 13 weeks or greater. CONCLUSIONS: These unique data provide a window of understanding into who contacts safe-abortion hotlines and why, and enable exploration of future directions for research on the role of safe-abortion hotlines in women's access to safe abortion. Public Health Implications. Safe-abortion hotlines should be evaluated not only for reducing harm but also for providing high-quality abortion care.
Authors: Maria M Fernandez; Francine Coeytaux; Rodolfo Gomez Ponce de León; Denise L Harrison Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Daniel A Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Todd Buchacker; Joseph E Potter; Carl P Schmertmann Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Roopan Gill; Gina Ogilvie; Wendy V Norman; Brian Fitzsimmons; Ciana Maher; Regina Renner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 5.428