Literature DB >> 2184229

An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants.

M R Spector1, T E Donovan, J I Nicholls.   

Abstract

A passive fit between osseointegrated implants and the prosthesis they will support has been advocated. An experimental model was developed to test the accuracy of three impression techniques and the components used to make the transfer records. Statistically, no significant difference was found between the three methods tested. From this initial study, it appears that further work is needed to isolate techniques that will predictably provide accurate registration of the position of endosseous implants.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2184229     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90235-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Morphometric parameters of the radial head: an anatomical study.

Authors:  T C Koslowsky; I Germund; F Beyer; K Mader; C F Krieglstein; J Koebke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

4.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions.

Authors:  Sang J Lee; Rebecca A Betensky; Grace E Gianneschi; German O Gallucci
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

8.  A New Trend in Recording Subgingival Tissue around an Implant While Making a Direct Abutment Impression.

Authors:  Suryakant C Deogade; Sneha S Mantri; Gunjan Dube; Radhika Shrivastava; Syed Noorani
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 9.  Screw-retained crown restorations of single implants: A step-by-step clinical guide.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf; Alaa' Z Abu Gharbyeh
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

10.  Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses.

Authors:  Mi-Young Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park; Ji-Man Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.