Literature DB >> 21841994

High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.

Paolo Trisi1, Marzio Todisco, Ugo Consolo, Domenico Travaglini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze, in an animal model, the histologic and biomechanical phenomena at the bone-implant interface of implants inserted with high torque (HT) as compared to low torque (LT) during the first 6 weeks of healing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty tapered-screw-form implants were placed in five hybrid sheep. The implant sites were placed in the mandible, using an extraoral approach; four were placed with HT (test: mean 110 Ncm) on one side and four were placed with LT (control: mean 10 Ncm) on the contralateral side. After 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks of healing, removal torque testing and resonance frequency analysis were performed and the animals were sacrificed for histologic examination.
RESULTS: Implants from the HT group showed significantly higher bone apposition than implants from the LT group at all examined healing times. Similarly, removal torque was consistently higher for the HT as compared to the LT group. A significant loss of primary stability in the HT group was evident 7 days after placement. Implants from the LT group achieved a significant increase in stability after 4 weeks. Resonance frequency analysis was unable to detect these histologic and biomechanical modifications of the bone-implant complex.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that high implant insertion torque in dense cortical bone does not induce bone necrosis or implant failure, but it does increase the primary stability of implants, which is extremely important in immediate loading protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21841994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of dental implant insertion torque using a manual ratchet.

Authors:  M M Goswami; Mukul Kumar; Abhinav Vats; A S Bansal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-09-24

2.  Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  J Y Cha; M D Pereira; A A Smith; K S Houschyar; X Yin; S Mouraret; J B Brunski; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Osseointegration of a novel injection molded 2-piece ceramic dental implant: a study in minipigs.

Authors:  Geninho Thomé; Rebecca Sandgren; Sergio Bernardes; Larissa Trojan; Nils Warfving; Benjamin Bellón; Benjamin E Pippenger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparative investigation of primary stability of four different dental implants in low-density bone model.

Authors:  Saied Nokar; Amirali Reza Rasouli-Ghahroudi; Elham Shidvash; Faezeh Atri
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb

5.  Osseointegration of titanium implants functionalised with phosphoserine-tethered poly(epsilon-lysine) dendrons: a comparative study with traditional surface treatments in sheep.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Katja Nuss; Alexander Bürki; Isabel Mosch; Miché le Sidler; Steve T Meikle; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Matteo Santin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  In vitro Evaluation of the Relationship between Gray Scales in Digital Intraoral Radiographs and Hounsfield Units in CT Scans.

Authors:  L Khojastepour; S Mohammadzadeh; M Jazayeri; M Omidi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Comparison of bone-to-implant contact and bone volume around implants placed with or without site preparation: a histomorphometric study in rabbits.

Authors:  Merav Folkman; Alina Becker; Isabelle Meinster; Mahmoud Masri; Zeev Ormianer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Jaime Aramburú; Leticia Pérez-Díaz; Tales Dias do Prado; Berenice Anina Dedavid; Patricia Mazon; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effect of Coronal Implant Design and Drilling Protocol on Bone-to-Implant Contact: A 3-Month Study in the Minipig Calvarium.

Authors:  Omer Cohen; Dieter D Bosshardt; Evegeny Weinberg; Gil Slutzkey; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  The effect of implant placement torque on crestal bone remodeling after 1 year of loading.

Authors:  Salwa Aldahlawi; Angela Demeter; Tassos Irinakis
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.