Literature DB >> 21841942

Skills training in minimally invasive surgery in Dutch obstetrics and gynecology residency curriculum.

Ellen Hiemstra1, Wendela Kolkman, Frank Willem Jansen.   

Abstract

The complexity of acquiring minimally invasive surgical (MIS) skills, combined with smaller case volumes for residents have pushed the development of skills training facilities on simulators outside the operating room (OR). Medico-legal and financial constraints have stimulated this development even more. However, the implementation of simulator training into a residency curriculum is shown to be troublesome. MIS skills training is organized in a uniform and easily applicable way in the Dutch obstetrics and gynecology residency curriculum. Every resident is obliged to attend the same basic surgical skills course, named Cobra-alpha course, intentionally during postgraduate year (PGY) 1 or 2. Furthermore, surgical skills are trained, evaluated and expanded on simulators in teaching hospitals. Additional to the Cobra-alpha course, residents may attend advanced training courses and congresses focusing on laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. This organization guarantees a uniform introduction to MIS skills training for every resident. However, preconditions for continuous training and evaluation after this introduction have to be optimized.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21841942      PMCID: PMC3133645          DOI: 10.1007/s10397-008-0402-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Surg        ISSN: 1613-2076


Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has evolved into a major surgical approach to treat a variety of gynecological disorders. This approach has considerable benefits for patients, such as a reduced morbidity, a shorter hospitalization, better cosmetic results, and an earlier return to normal activity [1]. However, acquiring MIS skills is more challenging than acquiring the skills necessary to perform conventional open surgical procedures. MIS poses specific demands on the surgeon. During MIS, the three-dimensional operating field has to be interpreted from a two-dimensional monitor display in which depth perception is altered. In addition, a surgeon has to manipulate long surgical instruments with diminished tactile feedback and fewer degrees of freedom, while adapting to the fulcrum effect [2, 3]. Apart from the complexity of acquiring MIS skills, a residency curriculum has to deal with smaller case volumes in the operating room (OR). This is due to a decrease in resident working hours and a declining trend in major gynecological surgical procedures in general [4, 5]. The smaller case volumes, combined with issues such as quality control, patient safety, efficiency and cost-effectiveness have led to an increasing interest in simulator training facilities outside the OR [3, 6]. Simulator training aims at progression along the learning curve by repetitive training of surgical skills with a lack a potential burden to patients in a pressure free environment. [3] With regard to MIS training the implementation into residency programs is shown to be troublesome [7-9]. Even though basic laparoscopic procedures have well been incorporated in residency, more advanced procedures are not [5, 10]. Lack of adequate training during residency influences the subsequent use of a specific technique and ultimately may restrict the implementation of MIS in daily practice after completion of residency training [11, 12]. In this report, we present the organization of MIS skills training in the Dutch obstetrics and gynecology residency curriculum which has continuously been evaluated and improved over the past 15 years.

Surgical skills in the Dutch residency curriculum

The obstetrics and gynecology residency program lasts 6 years in the Netherlands. A basic surgical skill course, named Cobra-alpha course, was incorporated in the curriculum in 1992. It has been evaluated and improved ever since. In 1997, this course was made compulsory for every resident. Attendance to this course is mandatory for obstetrics and gynecology residents during postgraduate year (PGY) 1 or 2. One third of this two-day course is spent on theory, while the complementary two thirds are spent on hands-on training. The first day focuses on basic technical skills, like instrument handling and knot tying, for conventional surgery, while the second day concerns the basic skills required for MIS which is subdivided into laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Two handbooks, focusing on the basics of surgery and laparoscopy, are used for study purposes and have been written for this course [13, 14]. The goal of the hands-on training in MIS during the Cobra-alpha course is to provide an introduction to simulator training for laparoscopic and hysteroscopic skills. Additionally, residents need to expand the acquired skills on simulators and have these skills evaluated by a mentor or MIS expert in their own clinic. Necessarily, time for training and evaluation has to be scheduled into the busy clinical practice of the residency program. A range of simulators is available for the hands-on training. Inanimate box trainers are used to practice basic laparoscopic skills like hand–eye coordination, adaptation to the lack of depth perception and camera holding. The construct validity is established for five of the available exercises in the box trainers [15]. These five exercises are placing a pipe cleaner through four small circles, stretching a rubber band around 16 nails, placing 13 beads in a letter ‘B’, cutting a marked circle from a rubber glove and intra-corporeal knot tying. The laparoscopic box trainer exercises are presented in Fig. 1. With regard to hysteroscopic simulators, vegetable models are available like pumpkins and red peppers [16]. Furthermore, chicken meat simulates an endometrium in a water-filled box and a porcine bladder simulates a uterus. A selection of hysteroscopic exercises is presented in Fig. 2. Basic hysteroscopic skills such as camera holding, instrument handling, safe use of energy sources and distention medium are trained. Besides, some procedures like diagnostic hysteroscopy, endometrium resection and resection of polyps or myomas are simulated.
Fig. 1

Laparoscopic training exercises

Fig. 2

Hysteroscopic training exercises

Laparoscopic training exercises Hysteroscopic training exercises Prior to the start of hands-on training, the exercises are introduced and explained with the aid of audiovisual demonstration. Afterwards, the participants go through a rotation of simulators. The surgical performance is assessed by calculating a score that rewards precision and speed. In the validated exercises, the calculated individual scores are compared to a previously established performance standard [15]. Training on the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulators is intensively supervised by experts in MIS. Regarding the number of participants attending the course, which varies from 32 to 36, each simulator is used by two or three residents and is supervised by one supervising expert. In addition to the mandatory Cobra-alpha course which is mainly focused on basic skills, residents can apply to two advanced courses in MIS, a laparoscopy course and a hysteroscopy course. These courses can be attended on a voluntary basis. The advanced courses are more procedure orientated than the Cobra-alpha course. In spite of using simulators, life surgery is used for teaching purposes. Procedure-specific courses can further enhance skills and knowledge, like a sacrocolpopexy course and a course regarding laparoscopic adnex surgery. Besides, a variety of (inter)national congresses focuses on MIS are organized. The mandatory Cobra-alpha course, advanced MIS courses and congresses form the training structure in the Dutch residency curriculum, combined with simulator training in the teaching hospitals during clinical rotation.

Discussion

The Dutch obstetrics and gynecology residency curriculum has a clear structure regarding the training of MIS skills. A mandatory basic surgical skills course is established for residency training which is nationwide accepted and has a broad Dutch faculty. Intentionally, the course has to be attended during PGY 1 or PGY 2. Additionally, residents may attend advanced courses and congresses focusing on laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. This structure enhances the implementation of basic MIS skills training into the residency curriculum. Basic MIS skills can be trained on simulators. Simulators have shown great potential for training and objectively assessing laparoscopic skills [17, 18]. The skills acquired are transferable to real operative procedures [19-21] and skills training is shown to decrease patient complications [22]. For every resident, there is a learning curve to achieve proficiency in performing MIS. Presumably, acquiring basic MIS skills by simulator training leads to progression along the first part of this learning curve resulting in better prepared residents for the actual surgery. After achievement of the basic skills, more attention can be paid to the specific procedure during surgery on real patients. With the growing evidence of valuable aspects of MIS simulator training, we feel there is no excuse for depriving residents of this training. The nationwide basic surgical skills course provides an introduction in simulator training for acquiring MIS skills. However, distributed practice is superior above massed practice, which is provided during a two-day course, for actually achieving these skills [23, 24]. Consequently, MIS skills can only be acquired if residents continue simulator training and evaluation in their own clinic. A first precondition for this continuance of training is the presence of simulator facilities in every cluster of teaching hospitals. A second precondition is that residents really do use these facilities. The first precondition is partially met. All 46 Dutch teaching hospitals are grouped in eight clusters and simulator training is offered in at least one teaching hospital of each cluster. However, the equipment varies widely among these hospitals. The advantage of training on the simulators used during the Cobra-alpha course is that these are easily fabricated and inexpensive. Besides, the exercises for the laparoscopic box trainer have been validated and a performance standard has been established. Regarding the second precondition, unfortunately, only one third of residents actually train on a simulator if training is offered on a voluntary basis [10]. The fact that most residents do not voluntarily train is in contradiction with the residents’ opinion that simulator training is an important addition to their residency program [10]. Hence, formal mandatory MIS training is urgently needed in every training hospital, which has to be scheduled in the busy practice of the residency program. In spite of structured training, proper evaluation of skills contributes to the learning effect [25]. However, the majority of residents’ surgical skills are evaluated informally and in a non-standardized fashion. There is a growing need for objective assessment tools. An example of such a tool is the Objective Structures Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS). This evaluation method consists of a global rating scale and has proven high reliability and construct validity for simulators [25, 26]. Regarding surgical competence, the requirements essential for certification in obstetrics and gynecology are clearly defined in the Netherlands. These requirements are set on a total number of each procedure a resident minimally has to perform. Additionally, the number performed on competence level 4 is established. Level 4 is defined “able to perform without supervision” on a 1 to 5 global rating scale (see Table 1) [27]. The target numbers for the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic procedures are expressed in Table 2 [27]. Although numbers of procedures are easily quantifiable, total numbers do not represent the actual competence of a resident due to individual difference in learning curves [6, 28]. Assessing a residents surgical skills and comparing these skills to an established performance standard would be more suitable than counting the number of procedures. In this way, the individual training demands can be met. This emphasizes, on one hand, the importance of objective assessment tools for evaluation of surgical skills and to set a performance standard. On the other hand, simulator training can fulfill the individual training demands, as a source of unlimited training while the training possibilities on real patients in the OR are scarcer. Ultimately, every resident should be able to achieve the predetermined level of skills at the end of residency.
Table 1

Global rating scale for level of competence

LevelDefinition
1Has theoretical knowledge
2Is able to perform under strict supervision
3Is able to perform under limited supervision
4Is able to perform without supervision
5Is able to supervise and educate others

Levels according to NVOG–HOOG, 2005

Table 2

Target numbers of MIS procedures required for certification

ProcedureTarget number (total)Target number performed on competence level 4
Laparoscopic surgery
 Diagnostic laparoscopy/sterilization5010
 Minor adhesiolysis10not applicable
 Salpingectomy/salpingotomy (inclusive EP)205
 Cystectomy10not applicable
Hysteroscopy
 Diagnostic hysteroscopy4010
 Resection polyps105
 Resection myomas type 0–I10not applicable
 Resection myomas type II10not applicable

EP Ectopic pregnancy, level 4 able to perform without supervision, target numbers according to NVOG–HOOG, 2005

Global rating scale for level of competence Levels according to NVOG–HOOG, 2005 Target numbers of MIS procedures required for certification EP Ectopic pregnancy, level 4 able to perform without supervision, target numbers according to NVOG–HOOG, 2005 Although some adaptations have to be made to incorporate continued training and evaluation in daily practice, a uniform introduction to MIS training on simulators is guaranteed for every resident in the Netherlands by a mandatory basic skills course, while advanced courses and congresses provide possibilities for enhanced education. Hopefully, this will facilitate and accelerate the implementation of MIS techniques in the gynecological surgical palette.
  23 in total

1.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model.

Authors:  D J Anastakis; G Regehr; R K Reznick; M Cusimano; J Murnaghan; M Brown; C Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Testing surgical skills of obstetric and gynecologic residents in a bench laboratory setting: validity and reliability.

Authors:  G M Lentz; L S Mandel; D Lee; C Gardella; J Melville; B A Goff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Ongoing deficits in resident training for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Donald Witzke; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Urology practice patterns after residency training in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Brian F Shay; Raju Thomas; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgical endoscopy training is integral to general surgery residency and should be integrated into residency and fellowships abandoned.

Authors:  Michael S Nussbaum
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2002-12

7.  Impact of work hour restrictions on resident case experience in an obstetrics and gynecology residency program.

Authors:  May Hsieh Blanchard; Saeid B Amini; Thomas M Frank
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Implementation of advanced laparoscopy into daily gynecologic practice: difficulties and solutions.

Authors:  W Kolkman; R Wolterbeek; F W Jansen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  D J Scott; W N Young; S T Tesfay; W H Frawley; R V Rege; D B Jones
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimal training design for procedural motor skills: a review and application to laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edward N Spruit; Guido P H Band; Jaap F Hamming; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-08

2.  Evaluation of the HystSim™-virtual reality trainer: an essential additional tool to train hysteroscopic skills outside the operation theater.

Authors:  Felix Neis; Sara Brucker; Melanie Henes; F Andrei Taran; Sascha Hoffmann; Markus Wallwiener; Birgitt Schönfisch; Nicole Ziegler; Angelika Larbig; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ascertaining the Effects of Tissue Sealers on Minor Laparoscopic Procedures between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pasquale De Franciscis; Marco La Verde; Luigi Cobellis; Antonio Mollo; Marco Torella; Fulvio De Simone; Gaetano Maria Munno; Emanuele Amabile; Carla Loreto; Angela Celardo; Nicola Fortunato; Gaetano Riemma
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  Feedback in laparoscopic skills acquisition: an observational study during a basic skills training course.

Authors:  B E Schaafsma; E Hiemstra; J Dankelman; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-04-28

5.  Using virtual-reality simulation to ensure basic competence in hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Mona M Savran; Anders Bo Nielsen; Bente Baekholm Poulsen; Poul Bak Thorsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Current practice in the removal of benign endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey.

Authors:  Lotte J E W van Dijk; Maria C Breijer; Sebastiaan Veersema; Ben W J Mol; Anne Timmermans
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 7.  Advanced hysteroscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Mark M Erian; Glenda R McLaren; Anna-Marie Erian
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Plastic and reconstructive uterus operations by minimally invasive surgery? A review on myomectomy.

Authors:  Anja Hirschelmann; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2012-01-09

9.  Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial.

Authors:  Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Jane Lindschou; Susanne Rosthøj; Bent Ottesen; Jeanett Strandbygaard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.