Louise Moody1, Kubra Choudhry. 1. Department of Industrial Design, Coventry University, UK. L.moody@coventry.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increasing array of rare inherited conditions can be detected as part of the universal newborn screening programme. The introduction and evaluation of these service developments require consideration of the ethical issues involved and appropriate mechanisms for informing parents and gaining consent if required. Exploration of parental views is needed to inform the debate and specifically consider whether more flexible protocols are needed to fit with the public perception of new developments in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study has been undertaken to explore perceptions and attitudes of parents and future parents to an expanded newborn screening programme in the United Kingdom and the necessary information provision and consent processes. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A mixed methods study involving focus groups (n = 29) and a web-survey (n = 142) undertaken with parents and future parents. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Parents want guaranteed information provision with clear decision-making powers and an awareness of the choices available to them. The difference between existing screening provision and expanded screening was not considered to be significant enough by participants to warrant formal written, informed consent for expanded screening. It is argued that the ethical review processes need to be more flexible towards the provision of information and consent processes for service developments in newborn screening.
BACKGROUND: An increasing array of rare inherited conditions can be detected as part of the universal newborn screening programme. The introduction and evaluation of these service developments require consideration of the ethical issues involved and appropriate mechanisms for informing parents and gaining consent if required. Exploration of parental views is needed to inform the debate and specifically consider whether more flexible protocols are needed to fit with the public perception of new developments in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study has been undertaken to explore perceptions and attitudes of parents and future parents to an expanded newborn screening programme in the United Kingdom and the necessary information provision and consent processes. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A mixed methods study involving focus groups (n = 29) and a web-survey (n = 142) undertaken with parents and future parents. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Parents want guaranteed information provision with clear decision-making powers and an awareness of the choices available to them. The difference between existing screening provision and expanded screening was not considered to be significant enough by participants to warrant formal written, informed consent for expanded screening. It is argued that the ethical review processes need to be more flexible towards the provision of information and consent processes for service developments in newborn screening.
Authors: R J Pollitt; A Green; C J McCabe; A Booth; N J Cooper; J V Leonard; J Nicholl; P Nicholson; J R Tunaley; N K Virdi Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Margarethe E J den Boer; Ronald J A Wanders; Andrew A M Morris; Lodewijk IJlst; Hugo S A Heymans; Frits A Wijburg Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Beth K Potter; Holly Etchegary; Stuart G Nicholls; Brenda J Wilson; Samantha M Craigie; Makda H Araia Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 2.537