Literature DB >> 9736188

Genetic screening and ethics: European perspectives.

R Chadwick1, H ten Have, J Husted, M Levitt, T McGleenan, D Shickle, U Wiesing.   

Abstract

Analysis and comparison of genetic screening programs shows that the extent of development of programs varies widely across Europe. Regional variations are due not only to genetic disease patterns but also reflect the novelty of genetic services. In most countries, the focus for genetic screening programs has been pregnant women and newborn children. Newborn children are screened only for disorders which are treatable. Prenatal screening when provided is for conditions for which termination may be offered. The only population screening programs for adults are those for thalassaemia carrier status in Cyprus, Greece and Italy. Social responses to genetic screening range from acceptance to hostility. There is a fundamental tension between individual and community in the debates in various European countries about implementation of screening programs. Opposition to genetic screening is frequently expressed in terms of arguments about "eugenics" with insufficient regard to the meaning of the term and its implications. Only a few countries have introduced explicit legislation on genetic screening. Legislation to address discrimination may provide more safeguards than legislation protecting genetic information itself.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Council of Europe; Danish Council of Ethics; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Council (Netherlands); Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (Norway); National Ethics Advisory Committee (France); Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9736188     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.23.3.255.2580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  9 in total

1.  The ethics and impact on behaviour of knowledge about one's own genome. Interview by Judy Jones.

Authors:  M Levitt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

Review 2.  Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice.

Authors:  Nicole E Cousens; Clara L Gaff; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Parental views on informed consent for expanded newborn screening.

Authors:  Louise Moody; Kubra Choudhry
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Parental consent for newborn screening in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  M-C Huang; C-K Lee; S-J Lin; I-C Lu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Genetic testing and private insurance--a case of "selling one's body"?

Authors:  D Hübner
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?

Authors:  Timothy Krahn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Reprogenetics, Genetic Tools and Reproductive Risk: Attitudes and Understanding Among Ethnic Groups in Israel.

Authors:  Frida Simonstein; Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Thierry Hurlimann; Martin Letendre; Nathalie Egalité
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Reprogenetics, reproductive risks and cultural awareness: what may we learn from Israeli and Croatian medical students?

Authors:  Miriam Ethel Bentwich; Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg; Ana Borovečki; Frida Simonstein
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.