Literature DB >> 21833640

Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community.

Benjamin R Montgomery1, Beverly J Rathcke.   

Abstract

Plant species vary greatly in the degree to which floral morphology restricts access to the flower interior. Restrictiveness of flower corollas may influence heterospecific pollen receipt, but the impact of floral morphology on heterospecific pollen transfer has received little attention. We characterized patterns of pollinator visitation and quantities of conspecific and heterospecific pollen receipt for 29 species with a range of floral morphologies in a prairie community dominated by the introduced plant Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge) which has an unrestrictive morphology. Pollinator overlap was significantly greater between Euphorbia and other unrestrictive flowers than restrictive flowers. Compared to flowers with restrictive morphologies, unrestrictive flowers received significantly more Euphorbia pollen, more heterospecific pollen from other sources, and a greater diversity of pollen species, but not more conspecific pollen. However, stigmatic surface area was significantly larger for flowers with unrestrictive morphologies, and the density of Euphorbia and other heterospecific pollen per stigmatic area did not significantly differ between flower types. These findings suggest that the smaller stigma size in restrictive flowers partly accounts for their decreased heterospecific pollen receipt, but that restrictiveness also allows species to increase the purity of pollen loads they receive. Given that restrictive flowers receive fewer heterospecific pollen grains but at a higher density, the effect of restrictiveness on fecundity depends on whether absolute quantity or density of heterospecific pollen affects fecundity more. Our results also indicate that abundant neighbors are not necessarily important heterospecific pollen sources since Euphorbia pollen was rarely abundant on heterospecifics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833640     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2094-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Successful invasion of a floral market.

Authors:  L Chittka; S Schürkens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Nickolas M Waser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  POLLEN-OVULE RATIO, POLLEN SIZE, AND THE RATIO OF STIGMATIC AREA TO THE POLLEN-BEARING AREA OF THE POLLINATOR: AN HYPOTHESIS.

Authors:  Robert William Cruden; Sharon Miller-Ward
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  PHLOX AND COLIAS: THE EFFICIENCY OF A POLLINATION SYSTEM.

Authors:  Donald A Levin; Denis E Berube
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Similarity indices, sample size and diversity.

Authors:  Henk Wolda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The influence of relative plant density and floral morphological complexity on the behaviour of bumblebees.

Authors:  Jane C Stout; John A Allen; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  Nickolas M Waser; Michael L Fugate
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interspecific pollinator movements reduce pollen deposition and seed production in Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae).

Authors:  Rebecca J Flanagan; Randall J Mitchell; Dustin Knutowski; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants.

Authors:  Carolina Laura Morales; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Carolina L Morales; Juan M Morales
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.

Authors:  James D Thomson; Hannah F Fung; Jane E Ogilvie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Disease where you dine: plant species and floral traits associated with pathogen transmission in bumble bees.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Kristen M Michaud; Stephen P Ellner; Scott H McArt; Philip C Stevenson; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Negative effects of heterospecific pollen receipt vary with abiotic conditions: ecological and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Ileana N Celaya; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Conchita Alonso; Víctor Parra-Tabla
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.

Authors:  Gerard X Smith; Mark T Swartz; Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Morphological Complexity as a Floral Signal: From Perception by Insect Pollinators to Co-Evolutionary Implications.

Authors:  Shivani Krishna; Tamar Keasar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Global geographic patterns of heterospecific pollen receipt help uncover potential ecological and evolutionary impacts across plant communities worldwide.

Authors:  Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Amelia Schroeder; Cristopher Albor; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Tiffany M Knight; Joanne M Bennett; Brian Suarez; Victor Parra-Tabla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Impact of the Invasive Alien Plant, Impatiens glandulifera, on Pollen Transfer Networks.

Authors:  Carine Emer; Ian P Vaughan; Simon Hiscock; Jane Memmott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variation in the degree of reciprocal herkogamy affects the degree of legitimate pollination in a distylous species.

Authors:  Xian-Feng Jiang; Xing-Fu Zhu; Qing-Jun Li
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Plants are visited by more pollinator species than pollination syndromes predicted in an oceanic island community.

Authors:  Xiangping Wang; Meihong Wen; Xin Qian; Nancai Pei; Dianxiang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Eight generations of native seed cultivation reduces plant fitness relative to the wild progenitor population.

Authors:  Riley Pizza; Erin Espeland; Julie Etterson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.