Literature DB >> 11395755

Successful invasion of a floral market.

L Chittka1, S Schürkens.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11395755     DOI： 10.1038/35079676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  53 in total

1.  Plant establishment and invasions: an increase in a seed disperser combined with land abandonment causes an invasion of the non-native walnut in Europe.

Authors:  Magdalena Lenda; Piotr Skórka; Johannes M H Knops; Dawid Morón; Stanisław Tworek; Michał Woyciechowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levine; Montserrat Vilà; Carla M D'Antonio; Jeffrey S Dukes; Karl Grigulis; Sandra Lavorel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Nickolas M Waser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community.

Authors:  Benjamin R Montgomery; Beverly J Rathcke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The presence of co-flowering species facilitates reproductive success of Pedicularis monbeigiana (Orobanchaceae) through variation in bumble-bee foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Kuo Liao; Robert W Gituru; You-Hao Guo; Qing-Feng Wang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  The compounding effects of high pollen limitation, selfing rates and inbreeding depression leave a New Zealand tree with few viable offspring.

Authors:  Megan L Van Etten; Jennifer A Tate; Sandra H Anderson; Dave Kelly; Jenny J Ladley; Merilyn F Merrett; Paul G Peterson; Alastair W Robertson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots.

Authors:  Jana C Vamosi; Tiffany M Knight; Janette A Steets; Susan J Mazer; Martin Burd; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Conspecific flowers of Sinapis arvensis are stronger competitors for pollinators than those of the invasive weed Bunias orientalis.

Authors:  Axel Hochkirch; Tamara Mertes; Julia Rautenberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-03

10.  Indirect competition for pollinators is weak compared to direct resource competition: pollination and performance in the face of an invader.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.