Literature DB >> 29947735

Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.

James D Thomson1,2, Hannah F Fung1, Jane E Ogilvie1,2.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: If two plant species share pollinators, it has been proposed that the interaction between them may range from competitive to facilitative, depending on the way in which they intermingle. In particular, the presence of a rewarding plant species may increase the rate of pollinator visitation to a less rewarding species in its vicinity, but the beneficial increase in visitation may be counteracted by a detrimental increase in heterospecific pollen transfer. We assessed this trade-off using bumble-bees foraging over a gradual spatial transition between two plant species in an indoor cage experiment.
Methods: We used two 'species' of artificial flowers - one more rewarding than the other - in arrays that varied in the degree of species intermingling. The flowers dispensed and received powdered food dyes serving as pollen analogues. Captive bumble-bees visited to collect sucrose solution. We quantified dye delivery to the adhesive-tape 'stigmas' in flowers by spectrophotometry. Key
Results: Across the spatial transition between species, the less attractive species received more dye (more bee visits) when in proximity to the more attractive species than it did when alone, but the larger dye loads were less pure (more heterospecific pollen transfer). The decline in purity cancelled out the gain in acquisition, so conspecific pollen receipt by the less attractive species was neutrally affected. The more attractive species received fewer visits when surrounded by the less attractive species, so the interaction between the two species was amensalism when considering conspecific pollen reception. Conclusions: Pollinator-mediated interactions between plant species depend on pollination quantity and purity, both of which can depend on spatial intermingling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29947735      PMCID: PMC6344345          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  22 in total

1.  Pollinator Behavior Mediates Negative Interactions between Two Congeneric Invasive Plant Species.

Authors:  Suann Yang; Matthew J Ferrari; Katriona Shea
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Heterospecific pollen deposition in Delphinium barbeyi: linking stigmatic pollen loads to reproductive output in the field.

Authors:  Heather M Briggs; Lucy M Anderson; Laila M Atalla; André M Delva; Emily K Dobbs; Berry J Brosi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks.

Authors:  Diego P Vázquez; Natacha P Chacoff; Luciano Cagnolo
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Competition for hummingbird pollination shapes flower color variation in Andean solanaceae.

Authors:  Nathan Muchhala; Sönke Johnsen; Stacey Dewitt Smith
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  POLLEN EXCHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF SPECIES PROXIMITY IN PHLOX.

Authors:  Donald A Levin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences.

Authors:  G H Pyke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities.

Authors:  Tia-Lynn Ashman; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Increased relative abundance of an invasive competitor for pollination, Lythrum salicaria, reduces seed number in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  Rebecca J Flanagan; Randall J Mitchell; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants.

Authors:  Carolina Laura Morales; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach.

Authors:  Martha E Lopezaraiza-Mikel; Richard B Hayes; Martin R Whalley; Jane Memmott
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.

Authors:  Nevin Cullen; Jing Xia; Na Wei; Rainee Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth O'Neill; Rebecca Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions.

Authors:  Tia-Lynn Ashman; Conchita Alonso; Victor Parra-Tabla; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity.

Authors:  Na Wei; Rainee L Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth M O'Neill; Rebecca A Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.

Authors:  Gerard X Smith; Mark T Swartz; Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Shrubs as magnets for pollination: A test of facilitation and reciprocity in a shrub-annual facilitation system.

Authors:  Ally Ruttan; Christopher J Lortie; Stephanie M Haas
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-01-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.