Literature DB >> 21833543

Current concentrations and spatial and temporal trends in mercury in Great Lakes Herring Gull eggs, 1974-2009.

D V Chip Weseloh1, David J Moore, Craig E Hebert, Shane R de Solla, Birgit M Braune, Daryl J McGoldrick.   

Abstract

Current concentrations and spatial and temporal trends of total mercury (Hg) were assessed in eggs of the Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) over the period 1974-2009 at 15 sites in the Great Lakes: 2-3 sites per lake and one site in each of 3 connecting channels. Current (2009) concentrations ranged from 0.064 μg/g (wet weight) at Chantry Island (Lake Huron) to 0.246 μg/g at Middle Island (Lake Erie). There were significant inter-colony differences in mean Hg concentrations (2005-2009). Mercury concentrations at 14 of 15 sites declined from 23 to 86% between when it was first measured (usually 1974) and 2009. Declining temporal trends over the entire period (1974-2009) were significant at 10 of the 15 sites. On the other hand, there were no significant trends in mercury over the last 15 years. In the early years, declines of Hg in Herring Gull eggs tracked those in Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax) in most Great Lakes. More recently, declines in gull eggs were more evident than in smelt and may be partially explained by temporal changes in the gull diet. When gull Hg data were adjusted for temporal changes in the gull diet, as inferred from stable nitrogen isotope values in eggs, significant declines in egg mercury levels were found only at 4 of 15 sites. Overall, Hg concentrations have declined in Great Lakes Herring Gull eggs over the period 1974-2009 but changes in the gull diet may be contributing, in part, to those declines. Examination of contaminant temporal trends in multiple indicator species will ensure accurate inferences regarding contaminant availability in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21833543     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0755-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  28 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal patterns in mercury contamination in sediments of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Chris Marvin; Scott Painter; Ronald Rossmann
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury.

Authors:  Peter Frederick; Nilmini Jayasena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries.

Authors:  John Munthe; R A Drew Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Charles T Driscoll; Cynthia C Gilmour; Reed Harris; Milena Horvat; Marc Lucotte; Olaf Malm
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Total and methyl mercury concentrations in seabird feathers and eggs.

Authors:  Alexander L Bond; Antony W Diamond
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Restoring piscivorous fish populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes causes seabird dietary change.

Authors:  Craig E Hebert; D V Chip Weseloh; Abde Idrissi; Michael T Arts; Robert O'Gorman; Owen T Gorman; Brian Locke; Charles P Madenjian; Edward F Roseman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Mercury, methylmercury, and selenium concentrations in eggs of common loons (Gavia immer) from Canada.

Authors:  A M Scheuhammer; J A Perrault; D E Bond
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America.

Authors:  David E Yates; David T Mayack; Kenneth Munney; David C Evers; Andrew Major; Taranjit Kaur; Robert J Taylor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in colonial waterbird eggs from Lake Athabasca and the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Canada.

Authors:  Craig E Hebert; D V Chip Weseloh; Stuart Macmillan; David Campbell; Wayne Nordstrom
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  The chronic toxicity of aluminium, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review.

Authors:  A M Scheuhammer
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Eggshell thinning in Japanese quail fed mercuric chloride.

Authors:  G S Stoewsand; J L Anderson; W H Gutenmann; C A Bache; D J Lisk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of mercury content in feathers of birds collected from the state of Michigan (1895-2007).

Authors:  Jessica A Head; Abigail DeBofsky; Janet Hinshaw; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Dredging and contaminant exposure to tree swallows nesting on the upper Mississippi River.

Authors:  Thomas W Custer; Paul M Dummer; Christine M Custer; David Warburton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Metal levels in eggs of waterbirds in the New York Harbor (USA): trophic relationships and possible risk to human consumers.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Susan Elbin
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2015

4.  Mercury in the Great Lakes region: bioaccumulation, spatiotemporal patterns, ecological risks, and policy.

Authors:  David C Evers; James G Wiener; Niladri Basu; R A Bodaly; Heather A Morrison; Kathryn A Williams
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Contaminant levels in Herring (Larus argentatus) and Great Black-backed Gull (Larus marinus) eggs from colonies in the New York harbor complex between 2012 and 2013.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Susan Elbin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 6.  Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: A synthesis.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Mark P Herzog; C Alex Hartman; Sarah H Peterson; David C Evers; Allyson K Jackson; John E Elliott; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.