Literature DB >> 27093907

Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: A synthesis.

Joshua T Ackerman1, Collin A Eagles-Smith2, Mark P Herzog3, C Alex Hartman3, Sarah H Peterson3, David C Evers4, Allyson K Jackson5, John E Elliott6, Stacy S Vander Pol7, Colleen E Bryan7.   

Abstract

Methylmercury contamination of the environment is an important issue globally, and birds are useful bioindicators for mercury monitoring programs. The available data on mercury contamination of birds in western North America were synthesized. Original data from multiple databases were obtained and a literature review was conducted to obtain additional mercury concentrations. In total, 29219 original bird mercury concentrations from 225 species were compiled, and an additional 1712 mean mercury concentrations, representing 19998 individuals and 176 species, from 200 publications were obtained. To make mercury data comparable across bird tissues, published equations of tissue mercury correlations were used to convert all mercury concentrations into blood-equivalent mercury concentrations. Blood-equivalent mercury concentrations differed among species, foraging guilds, habitat types, locations, and ecoregions. Piscivores and carnivores exhibited the greatest mercury concentrations, whereas herbivores and granivores exhibited the lowest mercury concentrations. Bird mercury concentrations were greatest in ocean and salt marsh habitats and lowest in terrestrial habitats. Bird mercury concentrations were above toxicity benchmarks in many areas throughout western North America, and multiple hotspots were identified. Additionally, published toxicity benchmarks established in multiple tissues were summarized and translated into a common blood-equivalent mercury concentration. Overall, 66% of birds sampled in western North American exceeded a blood-equivalent mercury concentration of 0.2 μg/g wet weight (ww; above background levels), which is the lowest-observed effect level, 28% exceeded 1.0 μg/g ww (moderate risk), 8% exceeded 3.0 μg/g ww (high risk), and 4% exceeded 4.0 μg/g ww (severe risk). Mercury monitoring programs should sample bird tissues, such as adult blood and eggs, that are most-easily translated into tissues with well-developed toxicity benchmarks and that are directly relevant to bird reproduction. Results indicate that mercury contamination of birds is prevalent in many areas throughout western North America, and large-scale ecological attributes are important factors influencing bird mercury concentrations. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioaccumulation; Birds; Eggs; Mercury; Toxicity Benchmarks

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27093907      PMCID: PMC5365029          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  81 in total

1.  The corticosterone stress response and mercury contamination in free-living tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor.

Authors:  Melinda D Franceschini; Oksana P Lane; David C Evers; J Michael Reed; Bart Hoskins; L Michael Romero
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury exposure in terrestrial birds far downstream of an historical point source.

Authors:  Allyson K Jackson; David C Evers; Sarah B Folsom; Anne M Condon; John Diener; Lizzie F Goodrick; Andrew J McGann; John Schmerfeld; Daniel A Cristol
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Mercury in western North America: A synthesis of environmental contamination, fluxes, bioaccumulation, and risk to fish and wildlife.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; James G Wiener; Chris S Eckley; James J Willacker; David C Evers; Mark Marvin-DiPasquale; Daniel Obrist; Jacob A Fleck; George R Aiken; Jesse M Lepak; Allyson K Jackson; Jackson P Webster; A Robin Stewart; Jay A Davis; Charles N Alpers; Joshua T Ackerman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Mixed-function oxygenases, oxidative stress, and chromosomal damage measured in lesser scaup wintering on the Indiana Harbor Canal.

Authors:  T W Custer; C M Custer; R K Hines; D W Sparks; M J Melancon; D J Hoffman; J W Bickham; J K Wickliffe
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Regional, temporal, and species patterns of mercury in Alaskan seabird eggs: mercury sources and cycling or food web effects?

Authors:  Rusty D Day; David G Roseneau; Stacy S Vander Pol; Keith A Hobson; Olivier F X Donard; Rebecca S Pugh; Amanda J Moors; Paul R Becker
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Demographic responses to mercury exposure in two closely related Antarctic top predators.

Authors:  A Goutte; P Bustamante; C Barbraud; K Delord; H Weimerskirch; O Chastel
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Mercury residues in tissues of dead and surviving birds fed methylmercury.

Authors:  M T Finley; W H Stickel; R E Christensen
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Derivation of screening benchmarks for dietary methylmercury exposure for the common loon (Gavia immer): rationale for use in ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  David C Depew; Niladri Basu; Neil M Burgess; Linda M Campbell; David C Evers; Keith A Grasman; Anton M Scheuhammer
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Distribution and accumulation of mercury in tissues of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks.

Authors:  Kevin P Kenow; Michael W Meyer; Randy K Hines; William H Karasov
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects.

Authors:  Charles T Driscoll; Robert P Mason; Hing Man Chan; Daniel J Jacob; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  18 in total

1.  Non-invasive biomonitoring of mercury in birds near thermal power plants: lessons from Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sunidhi Thakur; Shalini Dhyani; Kavita Bramhanwade; Krishna Kumar Pandey; Naresh Bokade; Ramesh Janipella; Paras Pujari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Foraging and fasting can influence contaminant concentrations in animals: an example with mercury contamination in a free-ranging marine mammal.

Authors:  Sarah H Peterson; Joshua T Ackerman; Daniel E Crocker; Daniel P Costa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Avian influenza antibody prevalence increases with mercury contamination in wild waterfowl.

Authors:  Claire S Teitelbaum; Joshua T Ackerman; Mason A Hill; Jacqueline M Satter; Michael L Casazza; Susan E W De La Cruz; Walter M Boyce; Evan J Buck; John M Eadie; Mark P Herzog; Elliott L Matchett; Cory T Overton; Sarah H Peterson; Magdalena Plancarte; Andrew M Ramey; Jeffery D Sullivan; Diann J Prosser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 4.  Internal Dynamics and Metabolism of Mercury in Biota: A Review of Insights from Mercury Stable Isotopes.

Authors:  Mi-Ling Li; Sae Yun Kwon; Brett A Poulin; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Laura C Motta; Moonkyoung Cho
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  Mercury risk to avian piscivores across western United States and Canada.

Authors:  Allyson Jackson; David C Evers; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Joshua T Ackerman; James J Willacker; John E Elliott; Jesse M Lepak; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Investigating spatial patterns of mercury and rodenticide residues in raptors collected near the Charlotte, NC, USA, metropolitan area.

Authors:  Scott M Weir; Jeffrey F Thomas; David N Blauch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Mercury bioaccumulation in freshwater fishes of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Vicki S Blazer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Modulatory Effects of Mercury (II) Chloride (HgCl2 ) on Chicken Macrophage and B-Lymphocyte Cell Lines with Viral-Like Challenges In Vitro.

Authors:  Biyao Han; Diego García-Mendoza; Hans van den Berg; Nico W van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.218

9.  Foraging Ecology Differentiates Life Stages and Mercury Exposure in Common Terns (Sterna hirundo).

Authors:  Annie M Bracey; Matthew A Etterson; Frederick C Strand; Sumner W Matteson; Gerald J Niemi; Francesca J Cuthbert; Joel C Hoffman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Modulators of mercury risk to wildlife and humans in the context of rapid global change.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; Ellen K Silbergeld; Niladri Basu; Paco Bustamante; Fernando Diaz-Barriga; William A Hopkins; Karen A Kidd; Jennifer F Nyland
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.