Literature DB >> 21909960

Mercury in the Great Lakes region: bioaccumulation, spatiotemporal patterns, ecological risks, and policy.

David C Evers1, James G Wiener, Niladri Basu, R A Bodaly, Heather A Morrison, Kathryn A Williams.   

Abstract

This special issue examines bioaccumulation and risks of methylmercury in food webs, fish and wildlife in the Laurentian Great Lakes region of North America, and explores mercury policy in the region and elsewhere in the United States and Canada. A total of 35 papers emanated from a bi-national synthesis of multi-media data from monitoring programs and research investigations on mercury in aquatic and terrestrial biota, a 3-year effort involving more than 170 scientists and decision-makers from 55 different universities, non-governmental organizations, and governmental agencies. Over 290,000 fish mercury data points were compiled from monitoring programs and research investigations. The findings from this scientific synthesis indicate that (1) mercury remains a pollutant of major concern in the Great Lakes region, (2) that the scope and intensity of the problem is greater than previously recognized and (3) that after decades of declining mercury levels in fish and wildlife concentrations are now increasing in some species and areas. While the reasons behind these shifting trends require further study, they also underscore the need to identify information gaps and expand monitoring efforts to better track progress. This will be particularly important as new pollution prevention measures are implemented, as global sources increase, and as the region faces changing environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909960     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0784-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  67 in total

1.  The role of sport-fish consumption advisories in mercury risk communication: a 1998-1999 12-state survey of women age 18-45.

Authors:  H A Anderson; L P Hanrahan; A Smith; L Draheim; M Kanarek; J Olsen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Watershed and discharge influences on the phase distribution and tributary loading of total mercury and methylmercury into Lake Superior.

Authors:  Christopher Babiarz; Stephen Hoffmann; Ann Wieben; James Hurley; Anders Andren; Martin Shafer; David Armstrong
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Retrospective analysis of mercury content in feathers of birds collected from the state of Michigan (1895-2007).

Authors:  Jessica A Head; Abigail DeBofsky; Janet Hinshaw; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Spatial trends and historical deposition of mercury in eastern and northern Canada inferred from lake sediment cores.

Authors:  D C G Muir; X Wang; F Yang; N Nguyen; T A Jackson; M S Evans; M Douglas; G Köck; S Lamoureux; R Pienitz; J P Smol; W F Vincent; A Dastoor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A synthesis of rates and controls on elemental mercury evasion in the Great Lakes Basin.

Authors:  Joseph S Denkenberger; Charles T Driscoll; Brian A Branfireun; Chris S Eckley; Mark Cohen; Pranesh Selvendiran
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Bi-phasic trends in mercury concentrations in blood of Wisconsin common loons during 1992-2010.

Authors:  Michael W Meyer; Paul W Rasmussen; Carl J Watras; Brick M Fevold; Kevin P Kenow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Mercury in breeding saltmarsh sparrows (Ammodramus caudacutus caudacutus).

Authors:  Oksana P Lane; Kathleen M O'Brien; David C Evers; Thomas P Hodgman; Andrew Major; Nancy Pau; Mark J Ducey; Robert Taylor; Deborah Perry
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Methylmercury exposure in Wisconsin: A case study series.

Authors:  Lynda Knobeloch; Dyan Steenport; Candy Schrank; Henry Anderson
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Toxicological significance of mercury in yellow perch in the Laurentian Great Lakes region.

Authors:  James G Wiener; Mark B Sandheinrich; Satyendra P Bhavsar; Joseph R Bohr; David C Evers; Bruce A Monson; Candy S Schrank
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Spatial and temporal variation in mercury bioaccumulation by zooplankton in Lake Champlain (North America).

Authors:  Celia Chen; Neil Kamman; Jason Williams; Deenie Bugge; Vivien Taylor; Brian Jackson; Eric Miller
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  10 in total

1.  MercNet: a national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States.

Authors:  David Schmeltz; David C Evers; Charles T Driscoll; Richard Artz; Mark Cohen; David Gay; Richard Haeuber; David P Krabbenhoft; Robert Mason; Kristi Morris; James G Wiener
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Heavy metal concentration in feathers of Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) nestlings in three coastal breeding colonies in Spain.

Authors:  Iratxe Rubio; Maite Martinez-Madrid; Leire Méndez-Fernández; Aitor Galarza; Pilar Rodriguez
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Benefits of mercury controls for the United States.

Authors:  Amanda Giang; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Differential gene expression associated with dietary methylmercury (MeHg) exposure in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Qing Liu; Niladri Basu; Giles Goetz; Nan Jiang; Reinhold J Hutz; Peter J Tonellato; Michael J Carvan
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Mercury exposure and neurochemical biomarkers in multiple brain regions of Wisconsin river otters (Lontra canadensis).

Authors:  Peter Dornbos; Sean Strom; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Linking fecal bacteria in rivers to landscape, geochemical, and hydrologic factors and sources at the basin scale.

Authors:  Marc P Verhougstraete; Sherry L Martin; Anthony D Kendall; David W Hyndman; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mercury in Nelson's Sparrow subspecies at breeding sites.

Authors:  Virginia L Winder; Steven D Emslie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Heavy Metals in Biota in Delaware Bay, NJ: Developing a Food Web Approach to Contaminants.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Nellie Tsipoura; Larry Niles; Amanda Dey; Christian Jeitner; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2019-06-13

9.  A synthesis of patterns of environmental mercury inputs, exposure and effects in New York State.

Authors:  D C Evers; A K Sauer; D A Burns; N S Fisher; D C Bertok; E M Adams; M E H Burton; C T Driscoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Foraging Ecology Differentiates Life Stages and Mercury Exposure in Common Terns (Sterna hirundo).

Authors:  Annie M Bracey; Matthew A Etterson; Frederick C Strand; Sumner W Matteson; Gerald J Niemi; Francesca J Cuthbert; Joel C Hoffman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.084

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.