Literature DB >> 21831976

Optimization of exposure parameters for cone beam computed tomography sialography.

F M Jadu1, M L Hill, M J Yaffe, Ernest W N Lam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The assessment of image quality is a crucial step in the development of a new imaging protocol. Having proposed and reported on a preliminary protocol for sialography using cone beam CT (CBCT), the purpose of this study was to further optimize this protocol by maximizing the image signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) and to relate these new data to previously published dosimetric data for CBCT sialography.
METHODS: An imaging phantom was constructed using samples with different concentrations of iodine and a water-immersed mandible. The CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was used to image the phantom using different peak kilovoltage (kVp) and milliamperage (mA) settings. SDNR was then calculated using the raw images based on mean pixel values (MPV) measured in selected regions of interest (ROI). Finally, a figure of merit (FOM) was calculated to examine the trade-off between image SDNR and effective radiation dose.
RESULTS: The SDNR demonstrated an expected increase as the kVp increased from 60 to 120. Also, images made with the higher mA setting (15) had greater SDNR. The iodine concentration also influenced the image quality such that SDNR increased with increased amounts of iodine. The calculated FOM was greatest for the technique using 80 kVp, with equivalent results for 10 mA and 15 mA.
CONCLUSION: An optimized protocol for CBCT sialography using CB MercuRay entails a 6 inch field of view with 80 kVp and 10 mA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21831976      PMCID: PMC3520345          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/81159071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  C J Martin; P F Sharp; D G Sutton
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Balancing patient dose and image quality.

Authors:  C J Martin; D G Sutton; P F Sharp
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Suzuki; Hidekazu Oshima; Norio Shiraki; Chisa Ikeya; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Kwong; J Martin Palomo; Michael A Landers; Alex Figueroa; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.

Authors:  Xin Liang; Reinhilde Jacobs; Bassam Hassan; Limin Li; Ruben Pauwels; Livia Corpas; Paulo Couto Souza; Wendy Martens; Maryam Shahbazian; Arie Alonso; Ivo Lambrichts
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Higher intracoronary attenuation improves diagnostic accuracy in MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Nico R Mollet; Pedro A Lemos; Fransesco Saia; Massimo Midiri; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Koichi Takada; Hiromitsu Onishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Reducing the concentration of contrast medium in dynamic computed tomography of the neck: consequences for image quality, side effects and cost.

Authors:  R Wang; I W Birchall; J Hanson
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.248

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparative study of the diagnostic capabilities of 2D plain radiograph and 3D cone beam CT sialography.

Authors:  F M Jadu; E W N Lam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Yaser Safi; Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska; Shiva Gandomi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.246

Review 3.  New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies.

Authors:  Supreet Jain; Kartik Choudhary; Ravleen Nagi; Stuti Shukla; Navneet Kaur; Deepak Grover
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.