Literature DB >> 21828062

Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?

Andrew J Einstein1, Juhani Knuuti.   

Abstract

The use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging has generated considerable discussion. Radiation should not be considered in isolation, but rather in the context of a careful examination of the benefits, risks, and costs of cardiovascular imaging. Such consideration requires an understanding of some fundamental aspects of the biology, physics, epidemiology, and terminology germane to radiation, as well as principles of radiological protection. This paper offers a concise, contemporary perspective on these areas by addressing pertinent questions relating to radiation and its application to cardiac imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21828062      PMCID: PMC3291500          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  37 in total

1.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  William Wijns; Philippe Kolh; Nicolas Danchin; Carlo Di Mario; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Folliguet; Scot Garg; Kurt Huber; Stefan James; Juhani Knuuti; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; Lorenzo Menicanti; Miodrag Ostojic; Massimo F Piepoli; Charles Pirlet; Jose L Pomar; Nicolaus Reifart; Flavio L Ribichini; Martin J Schalij; Paul Sergeant; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Miguel Sousa Uva; David Taggart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  The dose from Compton backscatter screening.

Authors:  Peter Rez; Robert L Metzger; Kenneth L Mossman
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume.

Authors:  O Gosling; R Loader; P Venables; N Rowles; G Morgan-Hughes; C Roobottom
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Multiple testing, cumulative radiation dose, and clinical indications in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Shepard D Weiner; Adam Bernheim; Michal Kulon; Sabahat Bokhari; Lynne L Johnson; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen Balter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  B Hesse; K Tägil; A Cuocolo; C Anagnostopoulos; M Bardiés; J Bax; F Bengel; E Busemann Sokole; G Davies; M Dondi; L Edenbrandt; P Franken; A Kjaer; J Knuuti; M Lassmann; M Ljungberg; C Marcassa; P Y Marie; F McKiddie; M O'Connor; E Prvulovich; R Underwood; B van Eck-Smit
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Myocardial perfusion scans: projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Human biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 82Rb.

Authors:  Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; Paco E Bravo; Caroline Esaias; Martin A Lodge; Jennifer Merrill; Robert F Hobbs; George Sgouros; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Igor Shuryak; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Anders Mattsson; Erik Holmberg; Roy Shore; Nancy G Hildreth; John D Boice
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project.

Authors:  R M Conroy; K Pyörälä; A P Fitzgerald; S Sans; A Menotti; G De Backer; D De Bacquer; P Ducimetière; P Jousilahti; U Keil; I Njølstad; R G Oganov; T Thomsen; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Tverdal; H Wedel; P Whincup; L Wilhelmsen; I M Graham
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  26 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.

Authors:  Annika Schuhbäck; Mohamed Marwan; Sören Gauss; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Christian Schneider; Michael Lell; Johannes Rixe; Christian Hamm; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Radiation exposure and safety for the electrophysiologist.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Isabel Castellano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  The association between aortic valve calcification, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiac size and function in a general population.

Authors:  Lida Khurrami; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jordi Sanchez Dahl; Rasmus Carter-Storch; Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen; Manan Pareek; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Radiobiology in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Pat Zanzonico; Lawrence Dauer; H William Strauss
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12

5.  Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Bomholt Hansen; Anders Sommer; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard; Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Tracking patient radiation exposure: challenges to integrating nuclear medicine with other modalities.

Authors:  Mathew Mercuri; Madan M Rehani; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: it takes two to tango.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Nella W Hendley; John Moskop; Nicklaus P Ashburn; S A Mahler; Jason P Stopyra
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.814

9.  Radiation exposure after myocardial perfusion imaging with Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride camera versus conventional camera.

Authors:  Ricardo Baumgarten; Rodrigo Julio Cerci; Amanda de Nadai Costa; Carlos Cunha Pereira-Neto; Pedro Prado; Marcello Zapparoli; Margaret Masukawa; Juliano Julio Cerci; João Vicente Vitola; Miguel Morita Fernandes-Silva
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  8-Hydroxy-2-Deoxyguanosine as Oxidative DNA Damage Biomarker of Medical Ionizing Radiation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Muhammad AbuArrah; Budi Yuli Setianto; Arif Faisal; Ahmad Hamim Sadewa
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.