Literature DB >> 21771956

Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging.

David J Brenner1, Igor Shuryak, Andrew J Einstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of reduced life expectancy on cancer risk by comparing estimated lifetime risks of lung cancer attributable to radiation from commonly used computed tomographic (CT) examinations in patients with and those without cancer or cardiac disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the use of clinically determined life tables, reductions in radiation-attributable lung cancer risks were estimated for coronary CT angiographic examinations in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and for surveillance CT examinations in patients treated for colon cancer. Statistical uncertainties were estimated for the risk ratios in patients who underwent CABG surgery and patients with colon cancer versus the general population.
RESULTS: Patients with decreased life expectancy had decreased radiation-associated cancer risks. For example, for a 70-year-old patient with colon cancer, the estimated reduction in lifetime radiation-associated lung cancer risk was approximately 92% for stage IV disease, versus 8% for stage 0 or I disease. For a patient who had been treated with CABG surgery, the estimated reduction in lifetime radiation-associated lung cancer risk was approximately 57% for a 55-year-old patient, versus 12% for a 75-year-old patient.
CONCLUSION: The importance of radiation exposure in determining optimal imaging usage is much reduced for patients with markedly reduced life expectancies: Imaging justification and optimization criteria for patients with substantially reduced life expectancies should not necessarily be the same as for those with normal life expectancies. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21771956     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11102452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  41 in total

Review 1.  Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Estimating cancer risk from 99mTc pyrophosphate imaging for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Igor Shuryak; Adam Castaño; Akiva Mintz; Mathew S Maurer; Sabahat Bokhari
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Estimating Cancer Risk Associated With Ionizing Radiation Exposure During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Anil K Gehi; Igor Shuryak; Stephen Balter; Justin Vandermolen; Johanna M Meulepas; Ryan King; Neil D Mehta; David J Brenner; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 6.  Imaging of cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 7.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: techniques and non-oncologic indications.

Authors:  Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

8.  An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Tyler Cho; Daniel Kreatsoulas; Joel Fritz; John M McGregor; Douglas A Hardesty
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak; Lan N Vu; Xinming Liu; Bharat Raval; David Martinez; Wei Wei; Yuan Cheng; Ehsan Samei; Shiva Gupta
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Patients with testicular cancer undergoing CT surveillance demonstrate a pitfall of radiation-induced cancer risk estimates: the timing paradox.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Richard J Lee; Michael E Gilmore; Ekin A Turan; Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Bob Liu; Chung Yin Kong; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.