Literature DB >> 21826755

Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.

Lidio Meireles1, Mert Gur, Ahmet Bakan, Ivet Bahar.   

Abstract

Modeling protein flexibility constitutes a major challenge in accurate prediction of protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions in docking simulations. The lack of a reliable method for predicting the conformational changes relevant to substrate binding prevents the productive application of computational docking to proteins that undergo large structural rearrangements. Here, we examine how coarse-grained normal mode analysis has been advantageously applied to modeling protein flexibility associated with ligand binding. First, we highlight recent studies that have shown that there is a close agreement between the large-scale collective motions of proteins predicted by elastic network models and the structural changes experimentally observed upon ligand binding. Then, we discuss studies that have exploited the predicted soft modes in docking simulations. Two general strategies are noted: pregeneration of conformational ensembles that are then utilized as input for standard fixed-backbone docking and protein structure deformation along normal modes concurrent to docking. These studies show that the structural changes apparently "induced" upon ligand binding occur selectively along the soft modes accessible to the protein prior to ligand binding. They further suggest that proteins offer suitable means of accommodating/facilitating the recognition and binding of their ligand, presumably acquired by evolutionary selection of the suitable three-dimensional structure.
Copyright © 2011 The Protein Society.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826755      PMCID: PMC3218357          DOI: 10.1002/pro.711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  60 in total

1.  ElNemo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement.

Authors:  Karsten Suhre; Yves-Henri Sanejouand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Escherichia coli adenylate kinase dynamics: comparison of elastic network model modes with mode-coupling (15)N-NMR relaxation data.

Authors:  N Alpay Temiz; Eva Meirovitch; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-15

3.  Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-03-01

4.  Large amplitude conformational change in proteins explored with a plastic network model: adenylate kinase.

Authors:  Paul Maragakis; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  FlexServ: an integrated tool for the analysis of protein flexibility.

Authors:  Jordi Camps; Oliver Carrillo; Agustí Emperador; Laura Orellana; Adam Hospital; Manuel Rueda; Damjan Cicin-Sain; Marco D'Abramo; Josep Lluís Gelpí; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. V: Nonlocal deformations.

Authors:  T Noguti; N Go
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1989

8.  Structural basis of hierarchical multiple substates of a protein. II: Monte Carlo simulation of native thermal fluctuations and energy minimization.

Authors:  T Noguti; N Go
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1989

Review 9.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Timothy R Lezon; Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

10.  Refinement of docked protein-ligand and protein-DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization.

Authors:  Erik Lindahl; Marc Delarue
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  41 in total

1.  Distributions of experimental protein structures on coarse-grained free energy landscapes.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Jie Liu; Yuan Wang; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Real-time monitoring of conformational transitions of single-molecule histone deacetylase 8 with nanocircuits.

Authors:  Seungyong You; James Froberg; Junru Yu; Manas Haldar; Abbas Sedigh; Sanku Mallik; D K Srivastava; Yongki Choi
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Structure-Encoded Global Motions and Their Role in Mediating Protein-Substrate Interactions.

Authors:  Ivet Bahar; Mary Hongying Cheng; Ji Young Lee; Cihan Kaya; She Zhang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Moving in the Right Direction: Protein Vibrations Steering Function.

Authors:  Katherine A Niessen; Mengyang Xu; Alessandro Paciaroni; Andrea Orecchini; Edward H Snell; Andrea G Markelz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Exploring Binding Mechanisms in Nuclear Hormone Receptors by Monte Carlo and X-ray-derived Motions.

Authors:  Christoph Grebner; Daniel Lecina; Victor Gil; Johan Ulander; Pia Hansson; Anita Dellsen; Christian Tyrchan; Karl Edman; Anders Hogner; Victor Guallar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Counterbalance of ligand- and self-coupled motions characterizes multispecificity of ubiquitin.

Authors:  Bhaskar Dasgupta; Haruki Nakamura; Akira R Kinjo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Features of large hinge-bending conformational transitions. Prediction of closed structure from open state.

Authors:  Arzu Uyar; Nigar Kantarci-Carsibasi; Turkan Haliloglu; Pemra Doruker
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Conformational selection in protein binding and function.

Authors:  Thomas R Weikl; Fabian Paul
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  THz time scale structural rearrangements and binding modes in lysozyme-ligand interactions.

Authors:  K N Woods
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 10.  Adaptability of protein structures to enable functional interactions and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Turkan Haliloglu; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.