Literature DB >> 14997571

Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.

Martin Zacharias1.   

Abstract

Most current docking methods to identify possible ligands and putative binding sites on a receptor molecule assume a rigid receptor structure to allow virtual screening of large ligand databases. However, binding of a ligand can lead to changes in the receptor protein conformation that are sterically necessary to accommodate a bound ligand. An approach is presented that allows relaxation of the protein conformation in precalculated soft flexible degrees of freedom during ligand-receptor docking. For the immunosuppressant FK506-binding protein FKBP, the soft flexible modes are extracted as principal components of motion from a molecular dynamics simulation. A simple penalty function for deformations in the soft flexible mode is used to limit receptor protein deformations during docking that avoids a costly recalculation of the receptor energy by summing over all receptor atom pairs at each step. Rigid docking of the FK506 ligand binding to an unbound FKBP conformation failed to identify a geometry close to experiment as favorable binding site. In contrast, inclusion of the flexible soft modes during systematic docking runs selected a binding geometry close to experiment as lowest energy conformation. This has been achieved at a modest increase of computational cost compared to rigid docking. The approach could provide a computationally efficient way to approximately account for receptor flexibility during docking of large numbers of putative ligands and putative docking geometries. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14997571     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  16 in total

1.  Protein-Protein Docking Using EMAP in CHARMM and Support Vector Machine: Application to Ab/Ag Complexes.

Authors:  Jon D Wright; Karen Sargsyan; Xiongwu Wu; Bernard R Brooks; Carmay Lim
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Algorithmic dimensionality reduction for molecular structure analysis.

Authors:  W Michael Brown; Shawn Martin; Sara N Pollock; Evangelos A Coutsias; Jean-Paul Watson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  What induces pocket openings on protein surface patches involved in protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  Susanne Eyrisch; Volkhard Helms
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.

Authors:  Lidio Meireles; Mert Gur; Ahmet Bakan; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  BP-Dock: a flexible docking scheme for exploring protein-ligand interactions based on unbound structures.

Authors:  Ashini Bolia; Z Nevin Gerek; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  A flexible docking scheme to explore the binding selectivity of PDZ domains.

Authors:  Z Nevin Gerek; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 7.  Computer-aided drug-discovery techniques that account for receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.547

8.  Building macromolecular assemblies by information-driven docking: introducing the HADDOCK multibody docking server.

Authors:  Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S J Melquiond; Sjoerd J de Vries; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Consistent improvement of cross-docking results using binding site ensembles generated with elastic network normal modes.

Authors:  Manuel Rueda; Giovanni Bottegoni; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.