Literature DB >> 23169174

Counterbalance of ligand- and self-coupled motions characterizes multispecificity of ubiquitin.

Bhaskar Dasgupta1, Haruki Nakamura, Akira R Kinjo.   

Abstract

Date hub proteins are a type of proteins that show multispecificity in a time-dependent manner. To understand dynamic aspects of such multispecificity we studied Ubiquitin as a typical example of a date hub protein. Here we analyzed 9 biologically relevant Ubiquitin-protein (ligand) heterodimer structures by using normal mode analysis based on an elastic network model. Our result showed that the self-coupled motion of Ubiquitin in the complex, rather than its ligand-coupled motion, is similar to the motion of Ubiquitin in the unbound condition. The ligand-coupled motions are correlated to the conformational change between the unbound and bound conditions of Ubiquitin. Moreover, ligand-coupled motions favor the formation of the bound states, due to its in-phase movements of the contacting atoms at the interface. The self-coupled motions at the interface indicated loss of conformational entropy due to binding. Therefore, such motions disfavor the formation of the bound state. We observed that the ligand-coupled motions are embedded in the motions of unbound Ubiquitin. In conclusion, multispecificity of Ubiquitin can be characterized by an intricate balance of the ligand- and self-coupled motions, both of which are embedded in the motions of the unbound form.
Copyright © 2012 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23169174      PMCID: PMC3588913          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  52 in total

1.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.

Authors:  Jing-Dong J Han; Nicolas Bertin; Tong Hao; Debra S Goldberg; Gabriel F Berriz; Lan V Zhang; Denis Dupuy; Albertha J M Walhout; Michael E Cusick; Frederick P Roth; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity.

Authors:  Gideon Schreiber; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights.

Authors:  Philip M Kim; Long J Lu; Yu Xia; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations.

Authors:  Wenjun Zheng; Bernard R Brooks; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dynamic property is a key determinant for protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hongjun Bai; Wenzhe Ma; Shiyong Liu; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-03

Review 6.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?

Authors:  Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  Protein structure databases with new web services for structural biology and biomedical research.

Authors:  Daron M Standley; Akira R Kinjo; Kengo Kinoshita; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Two folded conformers of ubiquitin revealed by high-pressure NMR.

Authors:  R Kitahara; H Yamada; K Akasaka
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Comparing interfacial dynamics in protein-protein complexes: an elastic network approach.

Authors:  Andrea Zen; Cristian Micheletti; Ozlem Keskin; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-08-08

10.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  On the specificity of protein-protein interactions in the context of disorder.

Authors:  Kaare Teilum; Johan G Olsen; Birthe B Kragelund
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  cNMA: a framework of encounter complex-based normal mode analysis to model conformational changes in protein interactions.

Authors:  Tomasz Oliwa; Yang Shen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Specific non-local interactions are not necessary for recovering native protein dynamics.

Authors:  Bhaskar Dasgupta; Kota Kasahara; Narutoshi Kamiya; Haruki Nakamura; Akira R Kinjo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.