Literature DB >> 21825126

Craniometric ratios of microcephaly and LB1, Homo floresiensis, using MRI and endocasts.

Robert C Vannucci1, Todd F Barron, Ralph L Holloway.   

Abstract

The designation of Homo floresiensis as a new species derived from an ancient population is controversial, because the type specimen, LB1, might represent a pathological microcephalic modern Homo sapiens. Accordingly, two specific craniometric ratios (relative frontal breadth and cerebellar protrusion) were ascertained in 21 microcephalic infants and children by using MRI. Data on 118 age-equivalent control (normocephalic) subjects were collected for comparative purposes. In addition, the same craniometric ratios were determined on the endocasts of 10 microcephalic individuals, 79 normal controls (anatomically modern humans), and 17 Homo erectus specimens. These ratios were then compared with those of two LB1 endocasts. The findings showed that the calculated cerebral/cerebellar ratios of the LB1 endocast [Falk D, et al. (2007) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2513-2518] fall outside the range of living normocephalic individuals. The ratios derived from two LB1 endocasts also fall largely outside the range of modern normal human and H. erectus endocasts and within the range of microcephalic endocasts. The findings support but do not prove the contention that LB1 represents a pathological microcephalic Homo sapiens rather than a new species, (i.e., H. floresiensis).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21825126      PMCID: PMC3161571          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105585108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.

Authors:  M J Morwood; P Brown; T Sutikna; E Wahyu Saptomo; K E Westaway; Rokus Awe Due; R G Roberts; T Maeda; S Wasisto; T Djubiantono
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comment on "The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis".

Authors:  Jochen Weber; Alfred Czarnetzki; Carsten M Pusch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.

Authors:  P Brown; T Sutikna; M J Morwood; R P Soejono; E Wayhu Saptomo; Rokus Awe Due
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The evolution and development of cranial form in Homosapiens.

Authors:  Daniel E Lieberman; Brandeis M McBratney; Gail Krovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?

Authors:  Debbie Argue; Denise Donlon; Colin Groves; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  Pygmoid Australomelanesian Homo sapiens skeletal remains from Liang Bua, Flores: population affinities and pathological abnormalities.

Authors:  T Jacob; E Indriati; R P Soejono; K Hsü; D W Frayer; R B Eckhardt; A J Kuperavage; A Thorne; M Henneberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Genetic, physiologic and ecogeographic factors contributing to variation in Homo sapiens: Homo floresiensis reconsidered.

Authors:  Gary D Richards
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Reciprocal evolution of the cerebellum and neocortex in fossil humans.

Authors:  Anne H Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Craniometric measures during development using MRI.

Authors:  Robert C Vannucci; Todd F Barron; Desiree Lerro; Susan C Antón; Susan J Vannucci
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Dean Falk; Charles Hildebolt; Kirk Smith; M J Morwood; Thomas Sutikna; Peter Brown; E Wayhu Saptomo; Barry Brunsden; Fred Prior
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  If the skull fits: magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for combined analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse.

Authors:  Brian J Nieman; Marissa C Blank; Brian B Roman; R Mark Henkelman; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Scaling of adult regional body mass and body composition as a whole to height: Relevance to body shape and body mass index.

Authors:  John M Schuna; Courtney M Peterson; Diana M Thomas; Moonseong Heo; Sangmo Hong; Woong Choi; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  Evolved developmental homeostasis disturbed in LB1 from Flores, Indonesia, denotes Down syndrome and not diagnostic traits of the invalid species Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Maciej Henneberg; Robert B Eckhardt; Sakdapong Chavanaves; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A Critical Evaluation of the Down Syndrome Diagnosis for LB1, Type Specimen of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Karen L Baab; Peter Brown; Dean Falk; Joan T Richtsmeier; Charles F Hildebolt; Kirk Smith; William Jungers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.

Authors:  Karen L Baab; Kieran P McNulty; Katerina Harvati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.