OBJECTIVES: Adult body mass (MB) empirically scales as height (Ht) squared (MB ∝ Ht(2) ), but does regional body mass and body composition as a whole also scale as Ht(2) ? This question is relevant to a wide range of biological topics, including interpretation of body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to quantify regional body mass [head (MH), trunk, arms, and legs] and whole-body composition [fat, lean soft tissue (LST), and bone mineral content (BMC)] in non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black, Mexican American, and Korean adults participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; n = 17,126) and Korean NHANES (n = 8,942). Regression models were developed to establish Ht scaling powers for each measured component with adjustments for age and adiposity. RESULTS: Exploratory analyses revealed a consistent scaling pattern across men and women of the four population groups: regional mass powers, head (∼0.8-1) < arms and trunk (∼1.8-2.3) < legs (∼2.3-2.6); and body composition, LST (∼2.0-2.3) < BMC (∼2.1-2.4). Small sex and population differences in scaling powers were also observed. As body mass scaled uniformly across the eight sex and population groups as Ht(∼2) , tall and short subjects differed in body shape (e.g., MH/MB ∝ Ht(-∼1) ) and composition. CONCLUSIONS: Adult human body shape and relative composition are a function of body size as represented by stature, a finding that reveals a previously unrecognized phenotypic heterogeneity as defined by BMI. These observations provide new pathways for exploring mechanisms governing the interrelations between adult stature, body morphology, biomechanics, and metabolism.
OBJECTIVES: Adult body mass (MB) empirically scales as height (Ht) squared (MB ∝ Ht(2) ), but does regional body mass and body composition as a whole also scale as Ht(2) ? This question is relevant to a wide range of biological topics, including interpretation of body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to quantify regional body mass [head (MH), trunk, arms, and legs] and whole-body composition [fat, lean soft tissue (LST), and bone mineral content (BMC)] in non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black, Mexican American, and Korean adults participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; n = 17,126) and Korean NHANES (n = 8,942). Regression models were developed to establish Ht scaling powers for each measured component with adjustments for age and adiposity. RESULTS: Exploratory analyses revealed a consistent scaling pattern across men and women of the four population groups: regional mass powers, head (∼0.8-1) < arms and trunk (∼1.8-2.3) < legs (∼2.3-2.6); and body composition, LST (∼2.0-2.3) < BMC (∼2.1-2.4). Small sex and population differences in scaling powers were also observed. As body mass scaled uniformly across the eight sex and population groups as Ht(∼2) , tall and short subjects differed in body shape (e.g., MH/MB ∝ Ht(-∼1) ) and composition. CONCLUSIONS: Adult human body shape and relative composition are a function of body size as represented by stature, a finding that reveals a previously unrecognized phenotypic heterogeneity as defined by BMI. These observations provide new pathways for exploring mechanisms governing the interrelations between adult stature, body morphology, biomechanics, and metabolism.
Authors: Dale A Schoeller; Frances A Tylavsky; David J Baer; William C Chumlea; Carrie P Earthman; Thomas Fuerst; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Heymsfield; Mary Horlick; Timothy G Lohman; Henry C Lukaski; John Shepherd; Roger M Siervogel; Lori G Borrud Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Andrew Dauber; Stephen H Lafranchi; Zoltan Maliga; Julian C Lui; Jennifer E Moon; Cailin McDeed; Katrin Henke; Jonathan Zonana; Garrett A Kingman; Tune H Pers; Jeffrey Baron; Ron G Rosenfeld; Joel N Hirschhorn; Matthew P Harris; Vivian Hwa Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ingrid Larsson; Björn Henning; Anna Karin Lindroos; Ingmar Näslund; Carl David Sjöström; Lars Sjöström Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Courtney M Peterson; Haiyan Su; Diana M Thomas; Moonseong Heo; Amir H Golnabi; Angelo Pietrobelli; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: B Bourgeois; B K Ng; D Latimer; C R Stannard; L Romeo; X Li; J A Shepherd; S B Heymsfield Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Steven B Heymsfield; Phoenix Hwaung; Fernando Ferreyro-Bravo; Moonseong Heo; Diana M Thomas; John M Schuna Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Steven B Heymsfield; Brooke Smith; Elizabeth A Chung; Krista L Watts; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Shengping Yang; Moonseong Heo; Diana M Thomas; Dusty Turner; Anja Bosy-Westphal; Manfred J Müller Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Brianna Bourgeois; Krista Watts; Diana M Thomas; Owen Carmichael; Frank B Hu; Moonseong Heo; John E Hall; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.817