Literature DB >> 22947655

If the skull fits: magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for combined analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse.

Brian J Nieman1, Marissa C Blank, Brian B Roman, R Mark Henkelman, Kathleen J Millen.   

Abstract

The mammalian brain and skull develop concurrently in a coordinated manner, consistently producing a brain and skull that fit tightly together. It is common that abnormalities in one are associated with related abnormalities in the other. However, this is not always the case. A complete characterization of the relationship between brain and skull phenotypes is necessary to understand the mechanisms that cause them to be coordinated or divergent and to provide perspective on the potential diagnostic or prognostic significance of brain and skull phenotypes. We demonstrate the combined use of magnetic resonance imaging and microcomputed tomography for analysis of brain and skull phenotypes in the mouse. Co-registration of brain and skull images allows comparison of the relationship between phenotypes in the brain and those in the skull. We observe a close fit between the brain and skull of two genetic mouse models that both show abnormal brain and skull phenotypes. Application of these three-dimensional image analyses in a broader range of mouse mutants will provide a map of the relationships between brain and skull phenotypes generally and allow characterization of patterns of similarities and differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947655      PMCID: PMC3472465          DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00093.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  92 in total

Review 1.  From head to toe: conservation of molecular signals regulating limb and craniofacial morphogenesis.

Authors:  R A Schneider; D Hu; J A Helms
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  Endocranial shape changes during growth in chimpanzees and humans: a morphometric analysis of unique and shared aspects.

Authors:  Simon Neubauer; Philipp Gunz; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Allometry and reorganization in horse skull proportions.

Authors:  L Radinsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Exploring dinosaur neuropaleobiology: viewpoint computed tomography scanning and analysis of an Allosaurus fragilis endocast.

Authors:  S W Rogers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Dandy-Walker syndrome: experience at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto.

Authors:  A Asai; H J Hoffman; E B Hendrick; R P Humphreys
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  1989

6.  Beyond the closed suture in apert syndrome mouse models: evidence of primary effects of FGFR2 signaling on facial shape at birth.

Authors:  Neus Martínez-Abadías; Christopher Percival; Kristina Aldridge; Cheryl A Hill; Timothy Ryan; Satama Sirivunnabood; Yingli Wang; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Alcohol embryopathy: some facts and speculations about pathogenesis.

Authors:  F Majewski
Journal:  Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol       Date:  1981

8.  Phenotypic variability and craniofacial dysmorphology: increased shape variance in a mouse model for cleft lip.

Authors:  Trish E Parsons; Erika Kristensen; Lynnette Hornung; Virginia M Diewert; Steven K Boyd; Rebecca Z German; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Brain phenotypes in two FGFR2 mouse models for Apert syndrome.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Cheryl A Hill; Jordan R Austin; Christopher Percival; Neus Martinez-Abadias; Thomas Neuberger; Yingli Wang; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  A bivariate approach to the widening of the frontal lobes in the genus Homo.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Ralph L Holloway
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.895

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A Genetic-Pathophysiological Framework for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Stephen R F Twigg; Andrew O M Wilkie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  High-throughput screening of mouse gene knockouts identifies established and novel skeletal phenotypes.

Authors:  Robert Brommage; Jeff Liu; Gwenn M Hansen; Laura L Kirkpatrick; David G Potter; Arthur T Sands; Brian Zambrowicz; David R Powell; Peter Vogel
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Integration of Brain and Skull in Prenatal Mouse Models of Apert and Crouzon Syndromes.

Authors:  Susan M Motch Perrine; Tim Stecko; Thomas Neuberger; Ethylin W Jabs; Timothy M Ryan; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Harnessing a Feasible and Versatile ex vivo Calvarial Suture 2-D Culture System to Study Suture Biology.

Authors:  Natalina Quarto; Siddharth Menon; Michelle Griffin; Julika Huber; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  The clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms and treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Eloise Stanton; Mark Urata; Jian-Fu Chen; Yang Chai
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.732

6.  Skeletal stem and progenitor cells maintain cranial suture patency and prevent craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Siddharth Menon; Ankit Salhotra; Siny Shailendra; Ruth Tevlin; Ryan C Ransom; Michael Januszyk; Charles K F Chan; Björn Behr; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker; Natalina Quarto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.