PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown a survival advantage over intravenous chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. However, significant toxicity has limited its acceptance. In an effort to reduce toxicity, the Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility of day 1 intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin followed by day 8 IP paclitaxel on an every 21-day cycle. METHODS: Patients with Stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal carcinomas or carcinosarcoma received paclitaxel 135mg/m(2) IV over 3h followed by cisplatin 75mg/m(2) IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP on day 8 of a 21 day cycle with 6 cycles planned. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia or dose-delay of greater than 2 weeks due to failure to recover counts, or Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity occurring within the first 4 cycles of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty of 23 patients enrolled were evaluable and nineteen (95%) completed all six cycles of therapy. Three patients experienced a DLT consisting of infection with normal absolute neutrophil count, grade 3 hyperglycemia, and grade 4 abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: This modified IP regimen which administers both IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin on day one, followed by IP paclitaxel on day eight, of a twenty-one day cycle appears feasible and is an attractive alternative to the intraperitoneal treatment regimen administered in GOG-0172.
PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown a survival advantage over intravenous chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. However, significant toxicity has limited its acceptance. In an effort to reduce toxicity, the Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility of day 1 intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin followed by day 8 IP paclitaxel on an every 21-day cycle. METHODS:Patients with Stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal carcinomas or carcinosarcoma received paclitaxel 135mg/m(2) IV over 3h followed by cisplatin 75mg/m(2) IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) IP on day 8 of a 21 day cycle with 6 cycles planned. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia or dose-delay of greater than 2 weeks due to failure to recover counts, or Grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity occurring within the first 4 cycles of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty of 23 patients enrolled were evaluable and nineteen (95%) completed all six cycles of therapy. Three patients experienced a DLT consisting of infection with normal absolute neutrophil count, grade 3 hyperglycemia, and grade 4 abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: This modified IP regimen which administers both IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin on day one, followed by IP paclitaxel on day eight, of a twenty-one day cycle appears feasible and is an attractive alternative to the intraperitoneal treatment regimen administered in GOG-0172.
Authors: Mark A Morgan; Michael W Sill; Keiichi Fujiwara; Benjamin Greer; Stephen C Rubin; Koen Degeest; S Diane Yamada; Steven Waggoner; Robert L Coleman; Joan L Walker; Robert S Mannel Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Gordon J S Rustin; Michael Quinn; Tate Thigpen; Andreas du Bois; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Anders Jakobsen; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Satoru Sagae; Kathryn Greven; Ignace Vergote; Andres Cervantes; Jan Vermorken Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-03-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: D S Alberts; P Y Liu; E V Hannigan; R O'Toole; S D Williams; J A Young; E W Franklin; D L Clarke-Pearson; V K Malviya; B DuBeshter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Setsuko K Chambers; H-H Sherry Chow; Mike F Janicek; Janiel M Cragun; Kenneth D Hatch; Haiyan Cui; Cynthia Laughren; Mary C Clouser; Janice L Cohen; Heather M Wright; Nisreen Abu Shahin; David S Alberts Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Craig Lockhart; Shankar Sundaram; John Sarantopoulos; Monica M Mita; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Jennifer L Moseley; Stephanie L Barber; Alex R Lane; Claudine Wack; Laurent Kassalow; Jean-François Dedieu; Alain C Mita Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Jennifer J Mueller; Amelia Kelly; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Kara Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Oliver Zivanovic; Dennis S Chi; Ginger J Gardner Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Natalie Gould; Michael W Sill; Robert S Mannel; Premal H Thaker; Paul A DiSilvestro; Steven E Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Deborah K Armstrong; Paula M Fracasso; Joan L Walker Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Joan L Walker; Mark F Brady; Lari Wenzel; Gini F Fleming; Helen Q Huang; Paul A DiSilvestro; Keiichi Fujiwara; David S Alberts; Wenxin Zheng; Krishnansu S Tewari; David E Cohn; Matthew A Powell; Linda Van Le; Susan A Davidson; Heidi J Gray; Peter G Rose; Carol Aghajanian; Tashanna Myers; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Stephen C Rubin; Robert S Mannel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 50.717