INTRODUCTION: Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with in vivo activity against taxane-sensitive and -resistant tumor cell lines and tumor xenografts. Cabazitaxel/cisplatin have therapeutic synergism in tumor-bearing mice, providing a rationale for assessing this combination in patients with solid tumors. METHODS: The primary objectives of this study were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cabazitaxel/cisplatin combined regimen (Part 1) and to assess antitumor activity at the MTD (Part 2). Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (10 in Part 1; 15 in Part 2). In Part 1, two dose levels were evaluated; the MTD for cabazitaxel/cisplatin (given Q3W) was 15/75 mg/m(2). DLTs occurring during Cycle 1 at the maximum administered dose (20/75 mg/m(2); acute renal failure and febrile neutropenia) and the MTD (febrile neutropenia and hypersensitivity despite pre-medication) were as expected for taxane/platinum combinations. For the 18 patients treated at the MTD, the most frequent possibly related non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (Grade ≥ 3) were nausea (16.7%), fatigue, acute renal failure and decreased appetite (each 11.1%). Neutropenia was the most frequent treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 hematologic laboratory abnormality at the MTD (77.8%). The best overall response at the MTD was stable disease, observed in 66.7% of patients. PK results of the combination did not appear to differ from single-agent administration for each agent. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with cabazitaxel/cisplatin had a manageable safety profile; no PK interactions were evident. The recommended Phase II dose for this combination is cabazitaxel/cisplatin 15/75 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity findings suggest that further evaluation of this combination in disease-specific trials is warranted.
INTRODUCTION:Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with in vivo activity against taxane-sensitive and -resistant tumor cell lines and tumor xenografts. Cabazitaxel/cisplatin have therapeutic synergism in tumor-bearing mice, providing a rationale for assessing this combination in patients with solid tumors. METHODS: The primary objectives of this study were to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a cabazitaxel/cisplatin combined regimen (Part 1) and to assess antitumor activity at the MTD (Part 2). Safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also examined. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (10 in Part 1; 15 in Part 2). In Part 1, two dose levels were evaluated; the MTD for cabazitaxel/cisplatin (given Q3W) was 15/75 mg/m(2). DLTs occurring during Cycle 1 at the maximum administered dose (20/75 mg/m(2); acute renal failure and febrile neutropenia) and the MTD (febrile neutropenia and hypersensitivity despite pre-medication) were as expected for taxane/platinum combinations. For the 18 patients treated at the MTD, the most frequent possibly related non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (Grade ≥ 3) were nausea (16.7%), fatigue, acute renal failure and decreased appetite (each 11.1%). Neutropenia was the most frequent treatment-emergent Grade ≥ 3 hematologic laboratory abnormality at the MTD (77.8%). The best overall response at the MTD was stable disease, observed in 66.7% of patients. PK results of the combination did not appear to differ from single-agent administration for each agent. CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with cabazitaxel/cisplatin had a manageable safety profile; no PK interactions were evident. The recommended Phase II dose for this combination is cabazitaxel/cisplatin 15/75 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity findings suggest that further evaluation of this combination in disease-specific trials is warranted.
Authors: G Frasci; P Comella; A Parziale; R Casaretti; A Daponte; A Gravina; L De Rosa; A Gallipoli; G Comella Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: E K Rowinsky; M R Gilbert; W P McGuire; D A Noe; L B Grochow; A A Forastiere; D S Ettinger; B G Lubejko; B Clark; S E Sartorius Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: V Diéras; A Lortholary; V Laurence; R Delva; V Girre; A Livartowski; S Assadourian; D Semiond; J Y Pierga Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Don S Dizon; Michael W Sill; Natalie Gould; Stephen C Rubin; S Diane Yamada; Robert L Debernardo; Robert S Mannel; Eric L Eisenhauer; Linda R Duska; Paula M Fracasso Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alain C Mita; Louis J Denis; Eric K Rowinsky; Johann S Debono; Andrew D Goetz; Leonel Ochoa; Bahram Forouzesh; Muralidhar Beeram; Amita Patnaik; Kathleen Molpus; Dorothée Semiond; Michèle Besenval; Anthony W Tolcher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Francesco Perri; Franco Ionna; Paolo Muto; Carlo Buonerba; Giuseppina Della Vittoria Scarpati; Davide Bosso; Franco Fulciniti; Antonio Daponte; Angela Argenone; Fabio Sandomenico; Giuseppe DI Lorenzo; Francesco Caponigro Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Analía Azaro; Jordi Rodón; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Sylvie Rottey; Silvia Damian; Richard Baird; Javier Garcia-Corbacho; Ron H J Mathijssen; Pierre-François Clot; Claudine Wack; Liji Shen; Maja J A de Jonge Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 3.333